Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Omega (Westport). 2021 Sep;83(4):656-672. doi: 10.1177/0030222819861558. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Online support groups are popular for peer support, particularly for uncommon or stigmatized topics including pregnancy and infant loss. We conducted a randomized, controlled, 6-week feasibility study of three groups: an anonymous BabyCenter.com loss support group, a closed Facebook loss group, or a control group. Intervention arm mothers were asked to sign on to their support sites for 6 weeks. Participants completed regular surveys, text message surveys after each log-in, and a final semistructured phone interview. Thirty women were randomized to each arm of the study. Women reported preference for anonymous groups and found it empowering to support others, although many noted an emotional cost to reading postings. Tracking usage online was a major issue despite multiple strategies to collect these data. This pilot demonstrated feasibility of a randomized trial for online perinatal support but noted a critical need for more reliable methods to track usage.
在线支持小组因其同伴支持而广受欢迎,尤其是对于一些罕见或污名化的话题,如怀孕和婴儿夭折。我们开展了一项为期 6 周的随机、对照、可行性研究,涉及三组:匿名的 BabyCenter.com 流产支持小组、封闭的 Facebook 流产小组或对照组。干预组的母亲被要求在 6 周内登录其支持网站。参与者定期完成调查,每次登录后进行短信调查,并进行最终的半结构化电话访谈。30 名女性被随机分配到研究的每个小组。女性报告称更喜欢匿名小组,并发现支持他人很有力量,但许多人指出阅读帖子会带来情绪代价。尽管采取了多种策略来收集这些数据,但在线监测使用情况仍然是一个主要问题。这项试验证明了在线围产期支持的随机试验的可行性,但也指出需要更可靠的方法来跟踪使用情况。