TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Petersgasse 18, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2584-7.
The use of herbal medicine (HM) has become an essential form of treatment and it is more and more common around the world. Little is known about the reasons that drive people to initially use HM or to maintain their behaviour, and whether the so-called "push and pull factors" known in the context of decision making for complementary and alternative medicine, also play a role for HM use. Here, our goal was to provide answers to these open questions and to analyse the reasons that motivate new, established and long-term HM consumers in detail.
Thirteen reasons for HM usage, which were previously identified within a qualitative approach, were analysed quantitatively in a nationwide online survey in Germany. Data of 2,192 German HM users from the general population were grouped into new, established and long-term users. We performed a factor analysis in order to identify factors underlying the set of reasons.
We discovered a reliable factor associated with longstanding family traditions and cultural importance of HM in Germany. This finding shows that the reasons for HM use require a three-factor structure going beyond the well-known push and pull factors that explain the use of complementary and alternative medicine. In using the identified factors for further calculations, we were able to reveal important group differences and test how the factor scores perform as predictors for the new, established and long-term choice of HM. Our results showed that a high score on the push factor is associated more with initial HM usage, while long-term HM usage is impacted more by high scores on the pull and traditional factors.
Our exploratory survey and analysis of the reasons that underlie HM usage aimed at providing a better understanding of the decision for this treatment form. The findings of our work deliver insights for medical practitioners and health-care providers, including the role of family traditions for HM usage and the finding that new HM users are driven to use this treatment form in part because of negative aspects they associate with conventional medicine.
草药(HM)的使用已成为一种基本的治疗形式,在全世界越来越普遍。人们最初使用 HM 或维持其行为的原因知之甚少,以及在补充和替代医学决策背景下所谓的“推动因素和拉动因素”是否也对 HM 的使用起作用。在这里,我们的目标是回答这些悬而未决的问题,并详细分析新、已确立和长期使用 HM 的人的动机原因。
在定性研究中,我们确定了 13 个 HM 使用原因,然后在德国进行了一项全国性的在线调查对这些原因进行了定量分析。我们将来自普通人群的 2192 名德国 HM 用户的数据分为新用户、已确立用户和长期用户。我们进行了一项因素分析,以确定原因背后的因素。
我们发现了一个与德国长期家庭传统和 HM 文化重要性相关的可靠因素。这一发现表明,HM 使用的原因需要一个三因素结构,超出了解释补充和替代医学使用的众所周知的推动和拉动因素。在使用确定的因素进行进一步计算时,我们能够揭示重要的群体差异,并测试这些因素得分如何作为 HM 新选择、已确立选择和长期选择的预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,推动因素得分高与 HM 的初始使用更相关,而长期 HM 使用则更多地受到拉动因素和传统因素得分高的影响。
我们对 HM 使用背后的原因进行了探索性调查和分析,旨在更好地理解这种治疗形式的决策。我们的工作结果为医疗从业者和医疗保健提供者提供了一些见解,包括家庭传统对 HM 使用的作用,以及新的 HM 用户使用这种治疗形式的部分原因是因为他们对常规医学的负面看法。