• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显性提示是否会影响自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童的物体加工?对自然教学法理论的检验。

Do ostensive cues affect object processing in children with and without autism? A test of natural pedagogy theory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2248-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01223-0. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-019-01223-0
PMID:31292736
Abstract

Theories suggest that the perception of others' actions and social cues leads to selective processing of object features. Most recently, natural pedagogy theory postulated that ostensive cues lead to a selective processing of an object's features at the expense of processing of its location. This study examined this hypothesis in 10-year-old children with and without autism spectrum condition (ASC) to better understand social information processing in ASC and the relevance of observing others in human object processing in general. Participants saw an agent either ostensively pointing to an object or non-ostensively grasping an object. Thereafter, the cued or uncued object changed either its location or identity. We assessed not only behavioral responses, but also participants' gaze behavior by means of eye tracking. In contrast to natural pedagogy theory, we found that in the non-ostensive grasping context, participants rather noticed an identity change than a location change. Moreover, location changes were more readily identified in the ostensive pointing context. Importantly, there was no difference between children with and without ASC. Our study shows that the perception of ostensively vs. non-ostensively framed actions leads to different processing of object features, indicating a close link between action perception, object processing, and social cues. Moreover, the lacking group difference in our study suggests that these basic perception-action processes are not impaired in autism.

摘要

理论表明,对他人行为和社会线索的感知会导致对物体特征的选择性处理。最近,自然教学法理论假设,明示线索会导致对物体特征的选择性处理,而牺牲对其位置的处理。本研究在 10 岁的自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)儿童和非 ASC 儿童中检验了这一假设,以更好地理解 ASC 中的社会信息处理以及在一般情况下观察他人在人类物体处理中的相关性。参与者看到一个代理要么明示地指向一个物体,要么非明示地抓住一个物体。之后,提示或未提示的物体改变了其位置或身份。我们不仅评估了行为反应,还通过眼动追踪评估了参与者的注视行为。与自然教学法理论相反,我们发现,在非明示抓取的情况下,参与者更注意到身份变化而不是位置变化。此外,在明示指向的情况下,位置变化更容易被识别。重要的是,有无 ASC 的儿童之间没有差异。我们的研究表明,对明示和非明示动作的感知会导致对物体特征的不同处理,这表明动作感知、物体处理和社会线索之间存在密切联系。此外,我们的研究中缺乏组间差异表明,这些基本的感知-动作过程在自闭症中没有受损。

相似文献

1
Do ostensive cues affect object processing in children with and without autism? A test of natural pedagogy theory.显性提示是否会影响自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童的物体加工?对自然教学法理论的检验。
Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2248-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01223-0. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
Is ostension any more than attention?指示难道不就是注意吗?
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 16;4:5304. doi: 10.1038/srep05304.
3
Ostension affects infant learning more than attention.示范对婴儿学习的影响大于注意力。
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104082. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104082. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Human ostensive signals do not enhance gaze following in chimpanzees, but do enhance object-oriented attention.人类的明示信号不会增强黑猩猩的目光追随能力,但会增强其对物体的注意力。
Anim Cogn. 2018 Sep;21(5):715-728. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1205-z. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Referent selection in children with Autism Spectrum Condition and intellectual disabilities: Do social cues affect word-to-object or word-to-location mappings?自闭症谱系障碍和智力障碍儿童的参照选择:社会线索是否会影响单词到物体或单词到位置的映射?
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Aug;91:103425. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.探究上肢伸展任务中注视线索化注意的促进和抑制的时间进程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2410-2423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01821-5.
7
Impaired representational gaze following in children with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的表征性注视跟随受损。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Oct;57:11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Gaze Following Is Not Dependent on Ostensive Cues: A Critical Test of Natural Pedagogy.目光跟随不依赖于明示线索:自然教学法的关键检验。
Child Dev. 2018 Nov;89(6):2091-2098. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13026. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
9
Sensitivity to communicative and non-communicative gestures in adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder: saccadic and pupillary responses.自闭症谱系障碍青少年和成年人对交际性和非交际性手势的敏感性:眼跳和瞳孔反应。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2515-27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4656-y. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Adult gaze influences infant attention and object processing: implications for cognitive neuroscience.成人注视影响婴儿的注意力和物体加工:对认知神经科学的启示。
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Mar;21(6):1763-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03986.x.