Suppr超能文献

通心宁颗粒()上市后再评价治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的多中心随机双盲双模拟阳性药平行对照临床试验

Post-marketing Re-evaluation of Tongxiening Granules () in Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy and Positive Control Trial.

机构信息

Institute of Spleen-Stomach Diseases, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100010, China.

出版信息

Chin J Integr Med. 2019 Dec;25(12):887-894. doi: 10.1007/s11655-019-3030-x. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tongxiening Granules (, TXNG) in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, and positive parallel controlled clinical trial was conducted from October 2014 to March 2016. Totally 342 patients from 13 clinical centers were enrolled and randomly assigned (at the ratio of 1:1) to a treatment group (171 cases) and a control group (171 cases) by a random coding table. The patients in the treatment group were administered orally with TXNG (5 g per time) combined with pinaverium bromide Tablet simulator (50 mg per time), 3 times per day. The patients in the control group were given TXNG simulator (5 g per time) combined with pinaverium bromide Tablets (50 mg per time), 3 times per day. The treatment course lasted for 6 weeks. The improvement of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) was used to evaluate the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included adequate relief (AR) rate, Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life Questionnaire (IBS-QOL), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and the recurrence rate at follow-ups. Safety indices including the adverse events (AEs) and related laboratory tests were evaluated.

RESULTS

Primary outcome: IBS-SSS at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6 showed no statistical significance in both full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS, P>0.05). After 6 weeks of treatment, the total effective rate of IBS-SSS scores in the treatment group (147/171,86.0%) was higher than the control group (143/171, 83.6%) by FAS (P>0.05). In regard to secondary outcomes, after 6-week treatment, there was no significant difference in AR rate, total score of IBS-QOL, improvement of HAMD and HAMA total scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The recurrence rate at 8-week follow-up was 12.35% (10/18) in treatment group and 15.79% (12/76) in control group, respectively (P>0.05). A total of 21 AEs occurred in 15 cases, of which 11 occurred in 8 cases in the treatment group and 10 AEs in 7 cases in the control group. The incidence of AEs had no statistical significance between the two goups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tongxiening Granules could relieve the symptoms of patients with IBS-D and the treatment effect was comparable to pinaverium bromide. (No. ChiCTR-IPR-15006415).

摘要

目的

评价痛泻宁颗粒治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)的有效性和安全性。

方法

采用随机、双盲、双模拟、阳性药平行对照的临床试验方法,于 2014 年 10 月至 2016 年 3 月在 13 家临床中心进行,共纳入 342 例患者,按 1∶1 比例随机分配至治疗组(171 例)和对照组(171 例)。治疗组给予痛泻宁颗粒(5 g/次)联合匹维溴铵片模拟剂(50 mg/次),3 次/d;对照组给予痛泻宁颗粒模拟剂(5 g/次)联合匹维溴铵片(50 mg/次),3 次/d。疗程均为 6 周。采用肠易激综合征症状严重程度评分(IBS-SSS)变化评估主要结局,次要结局包括有效缓解率、肠易激综合征生活质量问卷(IBS-QOL)评分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、随访复发率。安全性评价指标包括不良事件(AE)及相关实验室检查。

结果

主要结局:全分析集(FAS)和符合方案集(PPS)中,两组患者基线、治疗第 2、4、6 周的 IBS-SSS 评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗 6 周后,治疗组 IBS-SSS 评分总有效率(147/171,86.0%)高于对照组(143/171,83.6%),但差异无统计学意义(FAS,P>0.05)。次要结局:治疗 6 周后,两组患者有效缓解率、IBS-QOL 总分、HAMD 和 HAMA 总分的改善情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。8 周随访时,治疗组复发率为 12.35%(10/18),对照组为 15.79%(12/76),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组发生 15 例 21 次 AEs,其中 8 例发生 11 次;对照组发生 7 例 10 次 AEs。两组 AEs 发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

痛泻宁颗粒可缓解 IBS-D 患者的症状,与匹维溴铵的疗效相当。(注册号:ChiCTR-IPR-15006415)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验