Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255665. eCollection 2021.
Plenty of clinical studies have suggested the value of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but their efficacy and safety have not been systematically concluded yet. This article aimed to compare and rank the therapeutic effect and safety of CHM with routine pharmacotherapies and placebo in the treatment of IBS.
Randomized controlled trials regarding CHM to treat IBS were searched in six databases from inception to Jan 31, 2020. A network meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the data of included publications. The quality assessment was assessed by Cochrane Handbook and GRADEpro software. The risk ratio was calculated for dichotomous outcomes while the standardized mean difference was used for continuous variables with 95% credible intervals. A Funnel plot was performed to evaluate publication bias. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was conducted to rank the included interventions. Data were analyzed with STATA 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3.
3194 records were searched, and 28 eligible trials involving 3323 patients ere identified. Compared with conventional therapies and placebo, Jianpi-Chushi therapy showed significant improvement in adequate relief and IBS symptom severity scale; Shugan-Jianpi therapy showed the best efficacy in relieving the abdominal pain and abdominal distension; Wenshen-Jianpi therapy had a better effect on avoiding adverse effects and improving stool character.
This study confirmed that CHM could be beneficial for patients with IBS in relieving their clinical symptoms and should be recommended as alternative therapies. The quality of evidence in this study based on the GRADE system was "low".
大量临床研究表明,中草药(CHM)对肠易激综合征(IBS)患者具有一定价值,但尚未系统总结其疗效和安全性。本研究旨在比较和评估 CHM 与常规药物治疗和安慰剂治疗 IBS 的疗效和安全性。
检索了从建库至 2020 年 1 月 31 日 6 个数据库中关于 CHM 治疗 IBS 的随机对照试验。采用网状 Meta 分析对纳入文献的数据进行分析。使用 Cochrane 手册和 GRADEpro 软件对质量进行评估。二分类结局采用风险比进行计算,连续变量采用标准化均数差,置信区间为 95%。绘制漏斗图评估发表偏倚。采用累积排序曲线下面积对纳入的干预措施进行排序。采用 STATA 15.0 和 Review Manager 5.3 进行数据分析。
共检索到 3194 条记录,最终纳入 28 项符合标准的试验,涉及 3323 例患者。与常规治疗和安慰剂相比,健脾祛湿疗法在充分缓解和 IBS 症状严重程度评分方面有显著改善;疏肝健脾疗法在缓解腹痛和腹胀方面疗效最佳;温肾健脾疗法在避免不良反应和改善粪便性状方面效果更好。
本研究证实 CHM 可能有益于缓解 IBS 患者的临床症状,可作为替代治疗方法。本研究基于 GRADE 系统的证据质量为“低”。