Malchow Julia, Puppe Birger, Berk Jutta, Schrader Lars
Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Celle, Germany.
Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jun 25;6:203. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00203. eCollection 2019.
Pullets, i. e., chickens of layer lines are often raised in housings equipped with perches. In contrast, broiler chickens most often are raised in a barren environment that lacks any three-dimensional structures, even though broilers also are motivated to use elevated structures. In addition, environmental enrichment may improve welfare problems in broiler chickens, such as skeletal disorders or contact dermatitis. Due to ethical reasons, currently there are attempts to fatten the male chickens of layer strains or to use dual purpose strains. However, there is only limited knowledge on the behavior of these chickens until now. The aim of this study was to test the use of elevated grids and their effect on animal-based indicators (e.g., physical condition). In two successive trials, we kept a total of 1,217 male chickens from three strains (Lohmann Dual, Lohmann Brown Plus, Ross 308) that show differences in growth performance in 24 pens (two trials × three strains × eight pens). In half of the pens, grids were offered at three different heights (enriched groups); in the other half of the pens, no elevated structures were installed (control groups). We recorded the number of birds using the grids at the different heights as well as locomotor activity, walking ability, plumage cleanliness, and the footpad health of chickens. Chickens with low and medium growth performance preferred the highest grids during both the light and dark periods. In contrast, fast-growing chickens used the lowest grid more frequently. Fast-growing chickens kept in the enriched pens tended to have a higher level of locomotor activity and reduced chest cleanliness. Chickens from the medium growth performance strain showed better walking ability when kept in the enriched pens. Enrichment did not affect any of the welfare measures in the slow-growing chickens. These findings suggest that elevated structures may improve chicken welfare, particularly for medium growing chickens. For fast-growing chickens we found evidence for an improvement of animal-based indicators although they used the elevated structures less. However, regardless of growth performance, elevated grids offer the birds an opportunity to rest in a species-specific manner.
小母鸡,即蛋鸡品种的鸡,通常饲养在配备栖木的鸡舍中。相比之下,肉鸡大多饲养在缺乏任何三维结构的贫瘠环境中,尽管肉鸡也有利用高处结构的动机。此外,环境富集可能改善肉鸡的福利问题,如骨骼疾病或接触性皮炎。出于伦理原因,目前有人尝试育肥蛋鸡品种的雄性鸡或使用兼用型品种。然而,到目前为止,关于这些鸡的行为的知识还很有限。本研究的目的是测试高处网格的使用及其对基于动物的指标(如身体状况)的影响。在两个连续的试验中,我们将来自三个生长性能不同的品种(罗曼兼用型、罗曼褐 Plus、罗斯 308)的总共 1217 只雄性鸡饲养在 24 个鸡舍中(两个试验×三个品种×八个鸡舍)。在一半的鸡舍中,提供了三种不同高度的网格(富集组);在另一半鸡舍中,未安装高处结构(对照组)。我们记录了在不同高度使用网格的鸡的数量以及鸡的运动活动、行走能力、羽毛清洁度和脚垫健康状况。生长性能低和中等的鸡在光照和黑暗时期都更喜欢最高的网格。相比之下,快速生长的鸡更频繁地使用最低的网格。饲养在富集鸡舍中的快速生长的鸡往往运动活动水平较高且胸部清洁度降低。中等生长性能品种的鸡饲养在富集鸡舍中时行走能力更好。富集对生长缓慢的鸡的任何福利指标都没有影响。这些发现表明,高处结构可能改善鸡的福利,特别是对于中等生长速度的鸡。对于快速生长的鸡,我们发现有证据表明基于动物的指标有所改善,尽管它们较少使用高处结构。然而,无论生长性能如何,高处网格为鸡提供了以特定物种方式休息的机会。