A network conceptualization of the multiple facets of distress tolerance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Using a network analysis (NA) approach, the current study examined the relations among different facets of Distress Tolerance (DT). The NA approach quantifies and displays relations among variables in a visual network consisting of nodes (symptoms) and edges (partial correlations between symptoms).

DESIGN

An exploratory NA approach evaluated how manifestations of DT uniquely and systematically relate to one another.

METHODS

Undergraduate students ( = 288) completed 10 commonly used measures of DT including cognitive, behavioral, and self-report measures.

RESULTS

Results indicated all relations in the network were positive apart from social sensitivity and suppression. Further, individual DT facets did not form distinct community structures (nodes that cluster together and thus have stronger relations with each other than other nodes in the network).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of community structures suggests that DT is a general ability to tolerate distress that is comprised of many different facets rather than the idea that DT is hierarchical and comprised of distinct domains; a current debate within the literature. The self-reported ability to tolerate life demands and tasks was the most influential facet in the overall network suggesting the Frustration Discomfort Scale may be the best global measure of DT.