• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Infection rate for single lumen v triple lumen subclavian catheters.

作者信息

Yeung C, May J, Hughes R

机构信息

Infection Control Section of the Clinical Laboratory, Baptist Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;9(4):154-8. doi: 10.1086/645820.

DOI:10.1086/645820
PMID:3129491
Abstract

An infection rate was calculated for all subclavian catheters inserted during a 12-month period. The overall, single lumen, and triple lumen infection rates were 1.7% (42/2,431), 0.4% (8/1,936), and 6.9% (34/495), respectively. After excluding single lumen catheters in patients in a surgical cardiovascular unit who appeared to have a decreased risk of infection, the overall, single lumen, and triple lumen rates were 3.7% (42/1,140), 1.2% (8/645), and 6.9% (34/495), respectively. Within this group, 11.8% (28/237) of the catheters used for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were infected, whereas 1.6% (14/903) of the non-TPN catheters were infected. Of patients receiving total parental nutrition through a triple lumen catheter, 14.5% (25/172) became infected, whereas 4.6% (3/65) of the patients receiving total parental nutrition through a single lumen catheter became infected. Single and triple lumen patient groups appeared comparable based on average age, death rate, immunosuppression, underlying disease, and duration of catheterization, but the risk of infection was approximately three times greater for patients receiving total parental nutrition through a triple lumen catheter.

摘要

相似文献

1
Infection rate for single lumen v triple lumen subclavian catheters.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;9(4):154-8. doi: 10.1086/645820.
2
The effect of catheter type and site on infection rates in total parenteral nutrition patients.导管类型和部位对全胃肠外营养患者感染率的影响。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):71-4. doi: 10.1177/014860719401800171.
3
Single- versus triple-lumen central catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomized study in a critically ill population.单腔与三腔中心静脉导管相关脓毒症:一项针对危重症人群的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Med. 1992 Sep;93(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90233-2.
4
Use of triple-lumen subclavian catheters for administration of total parenteral nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):403-7. doi: 10.1177/0148607192016005403.
5
Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population.三腔与单腔中心静脉导管。对危重症人群的一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1139-43.
6
Femoral catheters increase risk of infection in total parenteral nutrition patients.
Nutr Clin Pract. 1995 Apr;10(2):60-6. doi: 10.1177/011542659501000260.
7
Increased infection rate in double-lumen versus single-lumen Hickman catheters in cancer patients.癌症患者中双腔 Hickman 导管与单腔 Hickman 导管相比感染率更高。
South Med J. 1990 Jan;83(1):34-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199001000-00010.
8
Central catheter infections: single- versus triple-lumen catheters. Influence of guide wires on infection rates when used for replacement of catheters.
Am J Med. 1988 Apr;84(4):667-72. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90102-7.
9
Risk of colonization of central venous catheters: catheters for total parenteral nutrition vs other catheters.中心静脉导管定植风险:全胃肠外营养用导管与其他导管的比较
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Jul;12(4):328-35.
10
Sepsis from triple- vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients.
Arch Surg. 1986 May;121(5):591-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400050109014.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between parenteral nutrition-containing intravenous lipid emulsion and bloodstream infections in patients with single-lumen central venous access: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.单腔中心静脉通路患者中含静脉用脂肪乳剂的肠外营养与血流感染的关系:一项随机试验的二次分析。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2023 Aug;47(6):783-795. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2530. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Position Statement for Central Venous Catheterization and Management 2020.印度重症医学学会2020年中心静脉置管与管理立场声明。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S6-S30. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-G23183.
3
Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections.
预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;31(3):551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Central line complications.中心静脉置管并发症。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;5(3):170-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.164940.
5
Prevention and management of infectious complications of percutaneous interventions.经皮介入操作感染并发症的预防与管理。
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;32(2):78-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549372.
6
epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.epic3:英格兰国民保健署医院内医源性感染预防的国家循证指南。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2.
7
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: recommendations relevant to interventional radiology for venous catheter placement and maintenance.血管内导管相关感染预防指南:与介入放射学中静脉导管置入和维护相关的建议。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Aug;23(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.04.023.
8
Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters: their evaluation in burn patients.含抗菌剂的中心静脉导管:在烧伤患者中的评估
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2006 Jun 30;19(2):63-7.
9
Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections.推荐摘要:血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1087-99. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir138.
10
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257. Epub 2011 Apr 1.