Gil R T, Kruse J A, Thill-Baharozian M C, Carlson R W
Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Receiving Hospital, MI 48201.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1139-43.
To evaluate a new multilumen central venous catheter we prospectively compared the infection rates of 63 single-lumen and 157 triple-lumen catheters in 145 critically ill patients. Using acute physiology scores, severity of illness was shown to be similar in the two patient groups. There were no significant differences in the rate of catheter colonization or catheter-related sepsis comparing single-lumen with triple-lumen catheters. However, the use of total parenteral nutrition or insertion at the femoral vein site significantly increased the rate of colonization. The only factor that was clearly associated with catheter sepsis was the duration of catheterization. Catheter sepsis increased from 1.5% to 10% when the period of catheterization exceeded 6 days. We conclude that the use of triple- and single-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients entails similar risks of infection.
为评估一种新型多腔中心静脉导管,我们前瞻性地比较了145例重症患者中63根单腔导管和157根三腔导管的感染率。根据急性生理学评分,两组患者的病情严重程度相似。比较单腔导管和三腔导管,导管定植率或导管相关脓毒症发生率无显著差异。然而,全胃肠外营养的使用或在股静脉部位插入显著增加了定植率。与导管脓毒症明确相关的唯一因素是导管插入时间。当导管插入时间超过6天时,导管脓毒症从1.5%增加到10%。我们得出结论,在重症患者中使用三腔和单腔中心静脉导管的感染风险相似。