• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP)的定性过程评估:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e030214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214.
2
Mixed methods evaluation of a hospital group model using an embedded research approach: study protocol.采用嵌入式研究方法对医院集团模式进行混合方法评估:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027086.
3
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
4
The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery.围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP患者研究):一项英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的方案,旨在评估大手术后的护理质量和结果。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 9;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00262-3.
5
6
Real-time monitoring and feedback to improve shared decision-making for surgery (the ALPACA Study): protocol for a mixed-methods study to inform co-development of an inclusive intervention.实时监测和反馈以改善手术的共享决策(ALPACA 研究):一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在为包容性干预措施的共同制定提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):e079155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079155.
7
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
8
REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study.减少英格兰和威尔士高质量髋关节骨折服务提供中的不必要差异(REduce):一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e049763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763.
9
Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme - improvements to NHS orthopaedic care in England: study protocol.首次正确执行计划的混合方法评估——对英格兰国民保健制度骨科护理的改进:研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2012-y.
10
Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation.激发英格兰东南部国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院信托机构参与质量改进协作的积极性:一项质性参与式评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e020930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930.

引用本文的文献

1
Volatile vs Total intravenous Anaesthesia for major non-cardiac surgery: a pragmatic randomised triaL (VITAL).挥发性麻醉剂与全静脉麻醉用于非心脏大手术的比较:一项实用随机试验(VITAL)。
Trials. 2024 Jun 27;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08159-w.
2
Impact of in-hospital postoperative complications on quality of life up to 12 months after major abdominal surgery.腹部大手术后院内术后并发症对长达12个月生活质量的影响。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1206-1212. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad167.
3
Effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in UK surgical settings and barriers and facilitators influencing their implementation: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.英国外科环境中质量改进合作的有效性及其实施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和证据综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002241.
4
Quality indicators for anesthesia and perioperative medicine.麻醉与围手术期医学质量指标。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):208-215. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001227. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery.围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP患者研究):一项英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的方案,旨在评估大手术后的护理质量和结果。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 9;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00262-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery.围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP患者研究):一项英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的方案,旨在评估大手术后的护理质量和结果。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 9;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00262-3.
2
Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial).规模化改善医疗服务:一项多环节质量改进干预措施以降低急诊腹部手术后死亡率的效果评价(EPOCH 试验)。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 13;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9.
3
The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme: improving outcomesd.围手术期质量改进计划:改善结局
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 Feb 2;79(2):117. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.2.117.
4
How do hospital boards govern for quality improvement? A mixed methods study of 15 organisations in England.医院董事会如何进行质量管理?一项对英格兰 15 家机构的混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):978-986. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006433. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
5
How does audit and feedback influence intentions of health professionals to improve practice? A laboratory experiment and field study in cardiac rehabilitation.审核和反馈如何影响卫生专业人员改善实践的意愿?心脏康复中的实验室实验和现场研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):279-287. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004795. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.医院参与手术结果监测计划与住院患者并发症和死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):505-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.90.
7
Measuring surgical outcomes for improvement: was Codman wrong?衡量手术结果以促进改善:科德曼错了吗?
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):469-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4.
8
Talking about quality: exploring how 'quality' is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems.谈质量:探索“质量”在欧洲医院及医疗体系中的概念界定
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 11;14:478. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-478.
9
Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care.文献不断增加,科学却停滞不前?医疗保健领域审核与反馈干预措施的系统评价、Meta回归及累积分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Nov;29(11):1534-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2913-y.
10
Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators.使用质量指标改进重症监护质量的定制多方面反馈计划的过程评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):233-41. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001375. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP)的定性过程评估:研究方案。

Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.

机构信息

Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.

Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e030214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
PMID:31296515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6624057/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIP's programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150  hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.

摘要

简介

围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP)旨在测量主要择期手术后的并发症,并通过将数据反馈给临床医生来改善这些并发症。先前的研究表明,尽管为国家临床审计收集数据需要投入大量资源,但它们所包含的信息并不总是被有效地用于改善当地服务。

方法与分析

我们将对 PQIP 进行形成性过程评估,包括一项多地点定性研究,以分析 PQIP 的计划理论、障碍、促进因素和影响实施的更广泛的背景因素。该研究将与 PQIP 项目团队和英格兰的六家国民保健服务(NHS)信托机构合作进行,这些信托机构是根据地理位置、医院类型、规模和参与 PQIP 的程度选择的。我们将包括一家对 PQIP 不感兴趣的信托机构进行比较,以探讨在任何实践变化中世俗趋势的作用。我们将使用半结构化访谈(在信托机构中最多 144 次,在项目团队中最多 12 次)、非参与观察(最多 150 小时)和文献分析。我们将跟踪围手术期数据的生命周期,探索它从创建到使用所经历的转变。我们将使用框架分析,其类别既来自我们的研究问题,也来自数据中出现的主题。

伦理与传播

伦敦大学学院伦理委员会已批准该研究(参考号 10375/001)。当地研究与发展办公室在与卫生研究管理局协调的情况下,已批准在 NHS 信托机构进行研究的许可。我们将遵循数据安全、保密和信息管理的准则。研究结果将定期与 PQIP 项目团队分享,以告知该计划的实施情况,并与参与的 NHS 信托机构分享,以帮助他们反思当前如何利用数据改善围手术期服务。