• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 2014 BTS/SIGN 步骤,使用英国普通实践中的真实生活处方来治疗哮喘。

Real-life prescribing of asthmatic treatments in UK general practice over time using 2014 BTS/SIGN steps.

机构信息

Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.

Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Jul 11;29(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0137-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41533-019-0137-7
PMID:31296867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6624291/
Abstract

The 2014 British Thoracic Society (BTS) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to asthma management. We investigated the management of asthma in primary care in the UK to understand how real-world practice compares with BTS/SIGN guidelines. Asthma patients were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink from September 2006 to August 2016. Aims were to classify patients according to BTS/SIGN steps, describe the proportion of patients transitioning between steps and describe patient demographics and clinical characteristics per group. Overall, 647,308 patients with asthma were identified (40,096 aged 5-11 years; 607,212 aged 12-80 years). Most treated patients were in step 1 or 2 (88.3% of children/67.5% of adults in December 2007; 83.0% of children/67.0% of adults in June 2016). Most patients remained within their treatment step within a 6-month interval (>78% of children and adults throughout the study duration). The proportion of patients stepping up and down reduced from the beginning of the study, although stepping down to step 1 was relatively common in both adults and children. Few patients had a recorded asthma review in the year before reference date (18.8% of children and 14.8% of adults). Although prescribing patterns meant that most patients remained within their treatment step throughout the study, we cannot be sure that this was because their disease was truly stable. The small proportion of patients stepping up/down and the lack of recorded asthma review suggest that patients may not be treated in accordance with BTS/SIGN guidelines.

摘要

2014 年英国胸科学会(BTS)和苏格兰校际指南网(SIGN)指南建议采用逐步方法来管理哮喘。我们调查了英国初级保健中哮喘的管理情况,以了解实际实践与 BTS/SIGN 指南的比较。从 2006 年 9 月至 2016 年 8 月,从英国临床实践研究数据链接中确定了哮喘患者。目的是根据 BTS/SIGN 步骤对患者进行分类,描述患者在各步骤之间的转移比例,并描述每个组的患者人口统计学和临床特征。总体而言,确定了 647308 例哮喘患者(5-11 岁患者 40096 例;12-80 岁患者 607212 例)。大多数接受治疗的患者处于第 1 或 2 步(2007 年 12 月,儿童中的 88.3%/成年人中的 67.5%;2016 年 6 月,儿童中的 83.0%/成年人中的 67.0%)。在 6 个月的间隔内,大多数患者仍处于其治疗步骤内(整个研究期间,儿童和成年人的比例均超过 78%)。尽管从研究开始,患者上下移动的比例有所下降,但成年人和儿童中都相对常见从较高步骤降至第 1 步。在参考日期前一年,很少有患者有记录的哮喘复查(儿童的 18.8%和成年人的 14.8%)。尽管处方模式意味着大多数患者在整个研究过程中仍处于其治疗步骤内,但我们不能确定这是因为他们的疾病确实稳定。上下移动的患者比例很小,并且缺乏记录的哮喘复查表明,患者可能没有按照 BTS/SIGN 指南进行治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/78a6f9c2a547/41533_2019_137_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/04ae0f5000b6/41533_2019_137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/0abea73930e8/41533_2019_137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/ef7028fcc1a4/41533_2019_137_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/78a6f9c2a547/41533_2019_137_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/04ae0f5000b6/41533_2019_137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/0abea73930e8/41533_2019_137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/ef7028fcc1a4/41533_2019_137_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1405/6624291/78a6f9c2a547/41533_2019_137_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-life prescribing of asthmatic treatments in UK general practice over time using 2014 BTS/SIGN steps.基于 2014 BTS/SIGN 步骤,使用英国普通实践中的真实生活处方来治疗哮喘。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Jul 11;29(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0137-7.
2
Derivation of asthma severity from electronic prescription records using British thoracic society treatment steps.基于英国胸科学会治疗步骤从电子处方记录推导哮喘严重程度。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02189-3.
3
Adherence to asthma guidelines in general practices.全科医疗中对哮喘指南的遵循情况。
J Asthma. 1999 Jun;36(4):381-7. doi: 10.3109/02770909909068231.
4
Antibiotic use in children with asthma: cohort study in UK and Dutch primary care databases.哮喘儿童抗生素的使用:英国和荷兰初级保健数据库中的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e022979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022979.
5
Asthma medication prescribing before, during and after pregnancy: a study in seven European regions.孕期前、孕期及产后哮喘药物的处方:一项在欧洲七个地区开展的研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 19;6(1):e009237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009237.
6
A review of prednisolone prescribing for children with acute asthma in the UK.英国儿童急性哮喘泼尼松龙处方情况综述。
J Asthma. 2016 Aug;53(6):563-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1118498. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
A medication assessment tool to evaluate adherence to medication guideline in asthmatic children.一种评估哮喘患儿用药依从性的药物评估工具。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Apr;35(2):289-95. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9702-7. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
8
Asthma prescribing, ethnicity and risk of hospital admission: an analysis of 35,864 linked primary and secondary care records in East London.哮喘处方、种族与住院风险:对伦敦东部 35864 例初级和二级保健记录的分析。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Aug 18;26:16049. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.49.
9
Pediatric asthma treatment: What to do when international guideline recommendations do not agree.儿科哮喘治疗:国际指南推荐意见不一致时该怎么办。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Jul;121(1):7-13.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Asthma treatment patterns in Dutch children using medication dispensing data.利用药物配药数据分析荷兰儿童的哮喘治疗模式。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 Sep;28(6):606-608. doi: 10.1111/pai.12751. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Dispensing Patterns of Inhaled Asthma Medication Before and During COVID-19 Among Young Adults in the Netherlands: A Retrospective Inception Cohort Study.荷兰年轻人在新冠疫情之前及期间吸入性哮喘药物的配药模式:一项回顾性队列起始研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 9;17:337-352. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S496841. eCollection 2025.
2
Modelling Asthma Treatment Dynamics: Insights from the g-Formula.哮喘治疗动态建模:g公式的见解
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 13;17:265-276. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S486869. eCollection 2025.
3
Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding patients' perceptions of asthma control: a qualitative study.理解哮喘控制患者的认知:一项定性研究。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jun 28;51(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01346-2017. Print 2018 Jun.
2
Exacerbation risk and characterisation of the UK's asthma population from infants to old age.从婴儿到老年,英国哮喘人群的恶化风险及特征。
Thorax. 2018 Apr;73(4):313-320. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210650. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Why and how to step down chronic asthma drugs.为何以及如何逐步减少慢性哮喘药物。
哮喘儿童的药物依从性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Mar 5;18:555-564. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S445534. eCollection 2024.
4
Real-World Dispensing Patterns of Inhalation Medication in Young Adult Asthma: An Inception Cohort Study.年轻成年哮喘患者吸入药物的真实世界配药模式:一项队列起始研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 14;15:721-732. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S410036. eCollection 2023.
5
Derivation of asthma severity from electronic prescription records using British thoracic society treatment steps.基于英国胸科学会治疗步骤从电子处方记录推导哮喘严重程度。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02189-3.
6
The Children's Anti-inflammatory Reliever (CARE) study: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of budesonide-formoterol as sole reliever therapy in children with mild asthma.儿童抗炎缓解剂(CARE)研究:一项关于布地奈德-福莫特罗作为轻度哮喘儿童单一缓解剂疗法的随机对照试验方案。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Oct 11;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00271-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Using routinely collected primary care records to identify and investigate severe asthma: a scoping review.利用常规收集的初级保健记录来识别和调查严重哮喘:范围综述。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Jan 26;31(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-00213-9.
BMJ. 2017 Oct 16;359:j4438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4438.
4
Validation of asthma recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中哮喘记录的验证
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e017474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017474.
5
Respiratory effect of beta-blockers in people with asthma and cardiovascular disease: population-based nested case control study.β受体阻滞剂对哮喘合并心血管疾病患者的呼吸影响:基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 27;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0781-0.
6
The epidemiology, healthcare and societal burden and costs of asthma in the UK and its member nations: analyses of standalone and linked national databases.英国及其成员国哮喘的流行病学、医疗保健、社会负担及成本:独立及关联国家数据库分析
BMC Med. 2016 Aug 29;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0657-8.
7
The national review of asthma deaths: what did we learn and what needs to change?全国哮喘死亡情况回顾:我们学到了什么,需要做出哪些改变?
Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Mar;11(1):14-24. doi: 10.1183/20734735.008914.
8
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
9
Is the BTS/SIGN guideline confusing? A retrospective database analysis of asthma therapy.英国胸科学会/苏格兰校际指南网络(BTS/SIGN)指南是否令人困惑?一项哮喘治疗的回顾性数据库分析。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00060.
10
Changes in primary care prescribing patterns for paediatric asthma: a prescribing database analysis.初级保健中小儿哮喘处方模式的变化:处方数据库分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jun;97(6):521-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.206268. Epub 2011 May 19.