Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 11;9(1):10028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46428-w.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived measures of lean mass demonstrate strong associations with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) derived measures of muscle volume (MV) in cross-sectional studies, however, few studies have compared changes in response to an intervention. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of DXA at detecting changes in lean mass, using MRI-derived MV as a reference standard. 10 male and 16 female subjects (29.2 ± 9.5 years) underwent DXA and MRI scans before and after a 10-week resistance training intervention. DXA thigh lean mass was compared to MRI mid-thigh MV, and percent change in size was compared between MRI and DXA. There was a strong correlation between measures cross-sectionally (r = 0.89) in agreement with previous investigations. However, there was a modest correlation of percentage change over time between methods (r = 0.49). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the amount of random error increased as the magnitude of the change from baseline increased. DXA measures of change in lean mass were modestly associated with MRI measures of change in MV. While there are several advantages to using DXA for the measurement of lean mass, the inability to accurately detect changes over time calls into question its use in clinical trials.
双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)测定的瘦体重与磁共振成像(MRI)测定的肌肉体积(MV)在横断面研究中具有很强的相关性,但是,很少有研究比较过干预后的变化。本研究旨在确定 DXA 在检测瘦体重变化方面的准确性,以 MRI 测定的 MV 作为参考标准。10 名男性和 16 名女性受试者(29.2±9.5 岁)在 10 周的抗阻训练干预前后接受了 DXA 和 MRI 扫描。DXA 大腿瘦体重与 MRI 大腿中部 MV 进行比较,并且比较了 MRI 和 DXA 之间的大小变化百分比。在横截面上,两种方法的相关性很强(r=0.89),与以往的研究结果一致。然而,两种方法之间随时间变化的百分比变化相关性适中(r=0.49)。Bland-Altman 图显示,随着从基线变化的幅度增加,随机误差的量增加。DXA 测定的瘦体重变化与 MRI 测定的 MV 变化中度相关。虽然 DXA 用于测量瘦体重具有几个优点,但其无法准确检测随时间的变化,这使得其在临床试验中的应用受到质疑。