Suppr超能文献

在苏格兰综合背景下实施邻里护理模式——患者视角

Implementation of a neighbourhood care model in a Scottish integrated context-views from patients.

作者信息

Leask Calum F, Gilmartin Andrea

机构信息

Aberdeen City Health & Social Care Partnership, Aberdeen, UK.

Health Intelligence Department, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

AIMS Public Health. 2019 Apr 17;6(2):143-153. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.2.143. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

There is a need to test new models of integrated health and social care, particularly due to increasing financial and epidemiological pressures on services. One critical component of testing new models is the acceptability to patients. Here, the aim was to understand the acceptability of a new model of care to patients by understanding their experience of being supported by a self-managing, community-based, integrated, health and social care team. The INCA service consisted of three support workers and three nurses in two teams. These teams were self-managing and had autonomy over service operations and care delivery. Eight interviews and satisfaction questionnaires were conducted with patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Patients found the service highly acceptable (mean overall satisfaction of 98%), self-reporting a variety of benefits to their wellbeing. Central to this acceptability was the autonomy of staff to adjust care frequency and duration to patients' needs, in addition to describing an active engagement and partnership within their support plans. Future work should aim to ascertain the experiences of staff working in this model and whether receiving support in this way improves clinical outcomes.

摘要

有必要测试新的综合健康与社会护理模式,尤其是鉴于服务面临的财务和流行病学压力不断增加。测试新模型的一个关键要素是患者的可接受性。在此,目标是通过了解患者在由自我管理、基于社区的综合健康与社会护理团队提供支持下的体验,来理解一种新护理模式对患者的可接受性。INCA服务由两个团队中的三名支持人员和三名护士组成。这些团队自我管理,在服务运营和护理提供方面拥有自主权。对患者进行了八次访谈并发放了满意度调查问卷。访谈内容进行了转录并进行了主题分析。患者认为该服务非常可接受(总体平均满意度为98%),他们自述该服务给自身健康带来了各种益处。这种可接受性的核心在于工作人员能够自主根据患者需求调整护理频率和时长,此外,患者还描述了在其支持计划中有积极的参与和伙伴关系。未来的工作应旨在确定在这种模式下工作的工作人员的体验,以及以这种方式获得支持是否能改善临床结果。

相似文献

8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10

本文引用的文献

6
Buurtzorg Nederland.荷兰布利兹奥护理组织
Am J Nurs. 2013 Aug;113(8):55-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000432966.26257.97.
8
How we design feasibility studies.我们如何设计可行性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验