Intensive Care Unit, St John of God Hospital Subiaco, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1190-1199. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05686-y. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
Severe immune dysregulation is common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with adverse outcomes. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) have immune-modulating and anti-apoptotic effects. However, their safety and efficacy in critically ill patients remain uncertain. We evaluated whether ESAs, administered to critically unwell adult patients admitted to the ICU, reduced mortality at hospital discharge.
The search strategy was conducted according to a predetermined protocol and included OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until 20 May 2019. Publications were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adult patients admitted to an ICU, that identified and reported a group receiving ESA therapy compared to a group not receiving ESA therapy and reported mortality. There were no language restrictions.
The systematic review included 21 studies with 5452 participants. In-hospital mortality, reported in 16 studies of which only one was at low risk of bias, was lower in the ESA group (276 of 2187 patients, 12.6%) than the comparator group (339 out of 2204 patients, 15.4%), [relative risk (RR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94, P = 0.006, I = 0.0%]. The RR of SAEs and thromboembolic events for the ESA and comparator groups were similar, RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.94-1.31, P = 0.228, I 66%) and 1.22 (95% CI 0.95-1.58, P = 0.086, I 47%), respectively.
In heterogenous populations of critically ill adults, evidence from RCTs of mainly low or unclear quality, suggests that ESA therapy may decrease mortality.
严重的免疫失调在入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中很常见,并且与不良预后相关。促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)具有免疫调节和抗凋亡作用。然而,其在危重症患者中的安全性和疗效仍不确定。我们评估了ESA 是否可降低入住 ICU 的重症成人患者的住院死亡率。
按照预先制定的方案进行检索策略,检索范围包括 OVID MEDLINE、OVID EMBASE 和 The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,检索时间从建库至 2019 年 5 月 20 日。纳入的研究为随机对照试验(RCT),研究对象为入住 ICU 的成年患者,试验组接受 ESA 治疗,对照组不接受 ESA 治疗,并报告死亡率。无语言限制。
该系统评价纳入 21 项研究,共计 5452 例患者。16 项研究报告了院内死亡率,其中仅有 1 项研究为低偏倚风险,ESA 组(2187 例患者中的 276 例,12.6%)的死亡率低于对照组(2204 例患者中的 339 例,15.4%)[相对风险(RR)0.82,95%置信区间(CI)0.71-0.94,P=0.006,I=0.0%]。ESA 组和对照组的严重不良事件(SAE)和血栓栓塞事件的 RR 相似,分别为 1.11(95% CI 0.94-1.31,P=0.228,I 66%)和 1.22(95% CI 0.95-1.58,P=0.086,I 47%)。
在异质性的危重症成人患者人群中,主要来自低质量或不清楚质量的 RCT 证据表明,ESA 治疗可能降低死亡率。