Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin Hospital (APHP), Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France; INSERM U970 (team 4), Parisian Cardiovascular Research Center, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Lariboisière Hospital (APHP) and INSERM U942, Paris, France.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 5;68(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.040.
BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggested a clinical benefit in treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with a high dose of erythropoietin (Epo) analogs. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy of epoetin alfa treatment on the outcome of OHCA patients in a phase 3 trial. METHODS: The authors performed a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients still comatose after a witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin were eligible. In the intervention group, patients received 5 intravenous injections spaced 12 h apart during the first 48 h (40,000 units each, resulting in a maximal dose of 200,000 total units), started as soon as possible after resuscitation. In the control group, patients received standard care without Epo. The main endpoint was the proportion of patients in each group reaching level 1 on the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale (survival with no or minor neurological sequelae) at day 60. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality rate, distribution of patients in CPC levels at different time points, and side effects. RESULTS: In total, 476 patients were included in the primary analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. At day 60, 32.4% of patients (76 of 234) in the intervention group reached a CPC 1 level, as compared with 32.1% of patients (78 of 242) in the control group (odds ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 1.48). The mortality rate and proportion of patients in each CPC level did not differ at any time points. Serious adverse events were more frequent in Epo-treated patients as compared with controls (22.6% vs. 14.9%; p = 0.03), particularly thrombotic complications (12.4% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients resuscitated from an OHCA of presumed cardiac cause, early administration of erythropoietin plus standard therapy did not confer a benefit, and was associated with a higher complication rate. (High Dose of Erythropoietin Analogue After Cardiac Arrest [Epo-ACR-02]; NCT00999583).
背景:初步数据表明,高剂量促红细胞生成素(Epo)类似物治疗院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者具有临床获益。
目的:作者旨在评估 epoetin alfa 治疗在 3 期试验中对 OHCA 患者结局的疗效。
方法:作者进行了一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。有目击的、疑似心源性 OHCA 后仍处于昏迷状态的患者符合入选条件。在干预组中,患者在复苏后尽快开始接受 5 次静脉注射,每 12 小时 1 次,持续 48 小时(每次 40,000 单位,最大总剂量 200,000 单位)。在对照组中,患者接受标准治疗而不使用 Epo。主要终点是两组患者在第 60 天时达到大脑功能分类(CPC)量表 1 级(无或轻微神经后遗症的存活)的比例。次要终点包括全因死亡率、不同时间点 CPC 水平的患者分布以及副作用。
结果:共有 476 例患者纳入主要分析。两组患者的基线特征相似。在第 60 天时,干预组 32.4%(234 例中的 76 例)的患者达到 CPC 1 级,而对照组 32.1%(242 例中的 78 例)(比值比:1.01;95%置信区间:0.68 至 1.48)。任何时间点的死亡率和 CPC 水平的患者比例均无差异。与对照组相比,Epo 治疗患者的严重不良事件更常见(22.6%比 14.9%;p = 0.03),特别是血栓并发症(12.4%比 5.8%;p = 0.01)。
结论:在从疑似心源性 OHCA 中复苏的患者中,早期给予促红细胞生成素加标准治疗没有获益,并且与更高的并发症发生率相关。(心脏骤停后高剂量促红细胞生成素类似物[Epo-ACR-02];NCT00999583)。
Eur Heart J. 2010-8-29
World J Cardiol. 2017-12-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-9-20
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024-3-28
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024-5-1
Front Neurol. 2021-2-18
Neurochem Res. 2021-4