Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Cardiovascular Disease Emergency Institute CC Iliescu Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6846-6857. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06315-4. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
Our aim was to evaluate the inter-vendor reproducibility of cardiovascular MR feature tracking (CMR-FT) for the measurement of segmental strain (SS) of the left ventricle (LV) as well as to test the accuracy of CMR-FT to detect regional myocardial pathology.
We selected 45 patients: 15 with normal CMR findings, 15 with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 15 with acute myocardial infarction. Segmental longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains were assessed with 4 different software. The inter-vendor difference as well as intra- and inter-observer variability was investigated. Furthermore, the accuracy of CMR-FT for the detection of structural (infarcted segments) as well as functional pathology (septal vs. lateral wall strain in left bundle branch block) was tested.
Between vendors, there were significant differences in values for all strains (p < 0.001). The software using a non-rigid algorithm for image registration and segmentation demonstrated the best intra- as well as inter-observer variability with interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.962 and coefficient of variation (CV) < 24%. For infarct location, the same software yielded the highest area under the curve values for radial and circumferential SS (0.872 and 0.859, respectively). One of the other three software using optical flow technology performed best for longitudinal SS (0.799) and showed the largest differences in SS between septum and lateral wall in the dilated cardiomyopathy group.
SS values obtained by CMR-FT are not interchangeable between vendors, and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility shows substantial variability among vendors. Overall, the different packages score relatively well to depict focal structural or functional LV pathology.
• Segmental myocardial strain values obtained by CMR feature tracking are not interchangeable between different vendors. • Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility shows substantial variability among vendors. • Segmental myocardial strains measured by CMR feature tracking score relatively well to depict focal structural or functional LV pathology.
本研究旨在评估心血管磁共振(CMR)特征追踪(CMR-FT)技术测量左心室(LV)节段应变(SS)的不同供应商间重复性,同时检验 CMR-FT 检测局部心肌病变的准确性。
我们选择了 45 例患者:15 例 CMR 正常,15 例扩张型心肌病,15 例急性心肌梗死。采用 4 种不同软件评估节段纵向、周向和径向应变。研究了不同供应商间的差异以及观察者内和观察者间的变异性。此外,还检验了 CMR-FT 检测结构性病变(梗死节段)和功能性病变(左束支传导阻滞时室间隔与侧壁应变)的准确性。
不同供应商间所有应变值均存在显著差异(p<0.001)。采用基于非刚性算法的图像配准和分割软件的观察者内和观察者间变异性最佳,组内相关系数(ICC)>0.962,变异系数(CV)<24%。对于梗死部位,同一软件的径向和周向 SS 的曲线下面积(AUC)最高(分别为 0.872 和 0.859)。其他 3 种使用光流技术的软件中,有 1 种软件的纵向 SS 表现最佳(0.799),且在扩张型心肌病组中,室间隔与侧壁间的 SS 差异最大。
CMR-FT 获得的 SS 值在不同供应商间不可互换,且观察者内和观察者间的重复性在不同供应商间存在较大差异。总体而言,不同软件包在描绘局灶性结构性或功能性 LV 病变方面均有较好的表现。
不同供应商的 CMR 特征追踪获得的节段心肌应变值不可互换。
观察者内和观察者间的重复性在不同供应商间存在较大差异。
CMR 特征追踪测量的节段心肌应变在描绘局灶性结构性或功能性 LV 病变方面表现较好。