Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Sep 1;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0380-4.
Regional right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is the hallmark of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C), but is currently only qualitatively evaluated in the clinical setting. Feature Tracking Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (FT-CMR) is a novel quantitative method that uses cine CMR to calculate strain values. However, most prior FT-CMR studies in ARVD/C have focused on global RV strain using different software methods, complicating implementation of FT-CMR in clinical practice. We aimed to assess the clinical value of global and regional strain using FT-CMR in ARVD/C and to determine differences between commercially available FT-CMR software packages.
We analyzed cine CMR images of 110 subjects (39 overt ARVD/C [mutation+/phenotype+], 40 preclinical ARVD/C [mutation+/phenotype-] and 31 control) for global and regional (subtricuspid, anterior, apical) RV strain in the horizontal longitudinal axis using four FT-CMR software methods (Multimodality Tissue Tracking, TomTec, Medis and Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Intersoftware agreement was assessed using Bland Altman plots.
For global strain, all methods showed reduced strain in overt ARVD/C patients compared to control subjects (p < 0.041), whereas none distinguished preclinical from control subjects (p > 0.275). For regional strain, overt ARVD/C patients showed reduced strain compared to control subjects in all segments which reached statistical significance in the subtricuspid region for all software methods (p < 0.037), in the anterior wall for two methods (p < 0.005) and in the apex for one method (p = 0.012). Preclinical subjects showed abnormal subtricuspid strain compared to control subjects using one of the software methods (p = 0.009). Agreement between software methods for absolute strain values was low (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.373).
Despite large intersoftware variability of FT-CMR derived strain values, all four software methods distinguished overt ARVD/C patients from control subjects by both global and subtricuspid strain values. In the subtricuspid region, one software package distinguished preclinical from control subjects, suggesting the potential to identify early ARVD/C prior to overt disease expression.
右心室(RV)区域性功能障碍是心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVD/C)的特征,但目前仅在临床环境中进行定性评估。特征追踪心血管磁共振(FT-CMR)是一种新颖的定量方法,它使用电影 CMR 来计算应变值。然而,大多数之前 ARVD/C 的 FT-CMR 研究都集中在使用不同软件方法的整体 RV 应变上,这使得 FT-CMR 在临床实践中的实施变得复杂。我们旨在评估 FT-CMR 在 ARVD/C 中的整体和区域性应变的临床价值,并确定商业可用的 FT-CMR 软件包之间的差异。
我们分析了 110 名受试者(39 名显性 ARVD/C [突变+/表型+]、40 名临床前 ARVD/C [突变+/表型-]和 31 名对照)的电影 CMR 图像,使用四种 FT-CMR 软件方法(多模态组织追踪、TomTec、Medis 和 Circle Cardiovascular Imaging)在水平长轴上评估 RV 整体和区域性(三尖瓣下、前壁、心尖)应变。使用 Bland-Altman 图评估软件间的一致性。
对于整体应变,所有方法均显示显性 ARVD/C 患者的应变较对照组降低(p<0.041),而无一种方法能区分临床前与对照组(p>0.275)。对于区域性应变,显性 ARVD/C 患者与对照组相比,所有节段的应变均降低,所有软件方法在三尖瓣区均达到统计学意义(p<0.037),两种方法在前壁(p<0.005),一种方法在心尖(p=0.012)。使用一种软件方法,临床前患者的三尖瓣下应变较对照组异常(p=0.009)。软件方法之间的绝对应变值的一致性较低(组内相关系数=0.373)。
尽管 FT-CMR 衍生应变值的软件间存在较大的变异性,但所有四种软件方法均通过整体和三尖瓣下应变值将显性 ARVD/C 患者与对照组区分开来。在三尖瓣区,一种软件包将临床前与对照组区分开来,这表明在显性疾病表达之前,有可能识别出早期 ARVD/C。