Nursing School, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, PR China.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(9):645-655. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0142. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
: This review aims to compare the development, characteristics and validity of three widely used breast cancer screening belief tools (the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale [CHBMS], the Breast Module of a Cancer Awareness Measures [BCAM] and the Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs Questionnaire [BCSBQ]). Literature reports were retrieved from electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, and other references. All three tools had good reliability and validity. Certain significant differences between these tools should be noted. CHBMS, BCAM and BCSBQ are valid and reliable instruments within certain populations. Due to the high heterogeneity among the targeted population, their characteristics and those of the instruments should be fully considered for clinical decision-making. The conclusion of this review contributes to the development of a more comprehensive and objective instruments based on the deficiencies of the existing studies.
本综述旨在比较三种广泛使用的乳腺癌筛查信念工具（冠军健康信念模型量表[CHBMS]、癌症意识措施的乳腺模块[BCAM]和乳腺癌筛查信念问卷[BCSBQ]）的发展、特点和有效性。文献报告从电子数据库中检索，包括 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 以及其他参考文献。这三种工具均具有良好的信度和效度。这些工具之间存在某些显著差异，值得注意。CHBMS、BCAM 和 BCSBQ 是在特定人群中有效且可靠的工具。由于目标人群之间存在高度异质性，因此在进行临床决策时，应充分考虑这些工具的特点。本综述的结论有助于在现有研究的基础上，开发更全面和客观的工具。
