Takala Tuija, Häyry Matti
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jul;28(3):551-576. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000471.
This paper explores how Finnish research ethics deals with matters of justice on the levels of practical regulation, political morality, and theoretical studies. The bioethical sets of principles introduced by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in the United States and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff and Peter Kemp in Europe provide the conceptual background, together with a recently introduced conceptual map of theories of justice and their dimensions. The most striking finding is that the internationally recognized requirement of informed consent for research on humans can be ideologically tricky in a Scandinavian welfare state setting.
本文探讨了芬兰研究伦理在实践规范、政治道德和理论研究层面如何处理正义问题。美国的汤姆·博尚和詹姆斯·蔡尔德雷斯以及欧洲的雅各布·达尔·伦托夫和彼得·肯普提出的生物伦理原则集，连同最近引入的正义理论及其维度的概念图，提供了概念背景。最引人注目的发现是，在斯堪的纳维亚福利国家背景下，国际上认可的人类研究知情同意要求在意识形态上可能会很棘手。
