Bridge HIV, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA.
Departments of Population Health and Internal Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Aug 15;81(5):516-520. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002066.
As daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) becomes standard for HIV prevention, routine use of PrEP is likely to increase within clinical trials of novel preventive agents. We describe the prevalence and characteristics of participants reporting nonstudy oral PrEP use within Microbicide Trials Network-017 (MTN-017), a phase 2 trial of a rectal microbicide.
One hundred ninety-five HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men and transgender women were enrolled and followed in MTN-017 across 8 sites in the United States, Thailand, South Africa, and Peru from 2013 to 2015. Nonstudy oral PrEP use was recorded on case report forms and progress notes. Characteristics of PrEP users and non-PrEP users were compared using tests of statistical significance.
Overall, 11% of participants reported nonstudy oral PrEP use, all from the San Francisco (SF) site, accounting for 58% (22/38) of participants enrolled in SF. There was a higher median number of sex partners reported in the past 8 weeks before enrollment among oral PrEP users vs. nonusers (7 vs. 2, P = 0.02). Most PrEP users (18/22, 82%) began PrEP treatment during screening/after enrollment, and most (19/22, 86%) decided to continue oral PrEP after study completion.
Nonstudy oral PrEP use in the first phase 2 study of tenofovir reduced-glycerin 1% gel was high at a single site in SF where community PrEP availability and use was expanding. Investigators should consider the evolving context of nonstudy oral PrEP use across trial sites when designing and interpreting trials of novel biomedical prevention modalities.
随着每日口服暴露前预防(PrEP)成为 HIV 预防的标准方案,在新型预防药物的临床试验中,PrEP 的常规使用可能会增加。我们描述了在 Microbicide Trials Network-017(MTN-017)中报告非研究性口服 PrEP 使用的参与者的流行率和特征,这是一项直肠杀菌剂的 2 期试验。
195 名未感染 HIV 的男男性行为者和跨性别女性于 2013 年至 2015 年期间在美国、泰国、南非和秘鲁的 8 个地点入组并参加了 MTN-017。非研究性口服 PrEP 使用情况在病例报告表和进展记录中记录。使用统计学显著性检验比较 PrEP 用户和非 PrEP 用户的特征。
总体而言,11%的参与者报告了非研究性口服 PrEP 使用,均来自旧金山(SF)地点,占 SF 地点入组参与者的 58%(22/38)。在入组前的过去 8 周内,口服 PrEP 使用者报告的性伴侣中位数多于非使用者(7 对 2,P=0.02)。大多数 PrEP 使用者(22 人中的 18 人,82%)在筛选/入组后开始 PrEP 治疗,大多数(22 人中的 19 人,86%)在研究完成后决定继续口服 PrEP。
在第一个使用泰诺福韦减少甘油 1%凝胶的 2 期研究中,在旧金山的一个单一地点,社区 PrEP 的可及性和使用正在扩大,非研究性口服 PrEP 的使用很高。在设计和解释新型生物医学预防模式的试验时,研究人员应考虑试验地点非研究性口服 PrEP 使用的不断变化的背景。