• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完成儿童实体瘤治疗后进行常规监测影像学检查是否弊大于利?系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Does routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood solid tumours cause more harm than good? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 12;8(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1096-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-1096-3
PMID:31300033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6624999/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This systemic review aims to synthesise the current literature surrounding off-therapy surveillance imaging in children and young people with extra-cranial solid tumours, with a view to establishing if routine imaging studies after treatment for childhood cancer increase overall survival, increase the psychological distress caused to patients and families, result in other harms to patients and are cost-effective strategies. Within this manuscript, we also describe how patient and public involvement has impacted upon the protocol.

METHODS

The search will cover thirteen different databases, key conference proceedings and trial registers, as well as reference lists and forward citations of included papers. Prominent authors/clinicians in the field will be contacted. A full search strategy is provided. The study designs to be included in the review will be added in an iterative way (RCTs, quasi-randomised trials, prospective cohorts and retrospective cohorts). Qualitative studies will also be eligible for inclusion. We will include studies which examine a programme of surveillance imaging that aims to detect relapse in children or young people up to age 25 years who have completed treatment for a malignant extracranial solid tumour and have no evidence of active and ongoing disease at end of treatment. The primary outcome is overall survival, with secondary outcomes including psychological distress indicators, number of imaging tests performed, other harms of imaging and cost-effectiveness measures. Studies will be screened and data extracted by two researchers. Studies will be critically appraised using a stratified version of the ROBINS-I tool. Where appropriate, data will be synthesised using a random effects meta-analysis. A detailed analysis plan, including assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias, is provided.

DISCUSSION

The aim of routine surveillance imaging is to detect recurrence of disease before clinical symptoms and signs develop. Some studies have suggested that most relapses of childhood cancer are detected due to clinical symptoms or signs, particularly in those with extra-cranial solid tumours, and when these relapses are detected by imaging, there is no increase in survival. This review aims to establish whether routine surveillance imaging is beneficial, as well as evaluating the potential negative impacts of surveillance programmes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018103764.

摘要

背景

本系统综述旨在综合目前关于儿童和青少年颅外实体瘤治疗后监测成像的文献,以确定治疗后儿童癌症常规成像研究是否提高总生存率、增加患者和家庭的心理困扰、导致患者其他伤害以及是否具有成本效益的策略。在本文稿中,我们还描述了患者和公众参与如何影响方案。

方法

搜索将涵盖十三个不同的数据库、主要会议记录和试验登记处,以及纳入论文的参考文献列表和前引文。该领域的知名作者/临床医生将被联系。提供了完整的搜索策略。将以迭代方式纳入综述的研究设计(RCT、准随机试验、前瞻性队列和回顾性队列)。合格的研究还包括定性研究。我们将纳入旨在检测已完成恶性颅外实体瘤治疗且治疗结束时无活动性和持续性疾病证据的 25 岁以下儿童或青少年复发的监测成像计划的研究。主要结局是总生存率,次要结局包括心理困扰指标、进行的影像学检查次数、影像学检查的其他危害和成本效益措施。两名研究人员将筛选和提取数据。研究将使用 ROBINS-I 工具的分层版本进行批判性评估。在适当的情况下,将使用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行综合。提供了详细的分析计划,包括评估异质性和发表偏倚。

讨论

常规监测成像的目的是在出现临床症状和体征之前检测疾病的复发。一些研究表明,大多数儿童癌症的复发是由于临床症状或体征发现的,特别是在颅外实体瘤患者中,当这些复发通过影像学检测到,并没有增加生存率。本综述旨在确定常规监测成像是否有益,以及评估监测计划的潜在负面影响。

系统综述注册

PROSPERO CRD42018103764。

相似文献

1
Does routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood solid tumours cause more harm than good? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.完成儿童实体瘤治疗后进行常规监测影像学检查是否弊大于利?系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 12;8(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1096-3.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors.儿童颅外实体瘤治疗后常规监测成像的证据进行系统评价:支持与反对。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):4949-4961. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3110. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
The impact of routine surveillance screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect tumour recurrence in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用磁共振成像(MRI)进行常规监测筛查对中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤患儿肿瘤复发检测的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;5(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0318-1.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Protocol for a systematic review of reductions in therapy for children with low-risk febrile neutropenia.低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症患儿治疗减量的系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;3:119. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-119.
8
Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.林奇综合征相关子宫内膜癌检测策略的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(42):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta25420.
9
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
10
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.定义识别成人和儿童乳糜泻的最佳策略:系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors.儿童颅外实体瘤治疗后常规监测成像的证据进行系统评价:支持与反对。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):4949-4961. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3110. Epub 2020 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine surveillance imaging after end of therapy for pediatric extracranial tumors: A retrospective analysis.小儿颅外肿瘤治疗结束后的常规监测成像:一项回顾性分析。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Jan;65(1). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26723. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
3
Does Routine Imaging of Patients for Progression or Relapse Improve Survival in Rhabdomyosarcoma?对横纹肌肉瘤患者进行进展或复发的常规影像学检查能否提高生存率?
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Feb;63(2):202-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25750. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
5
Pediatric oncology surveillance imaging: two recommendations. Abandon CT scanning, and randomize to imaging or solely clinical follow-up.儿科肿瘤监测影像学:两项建议。放弃 CT 扫描,随机进行影像学或仅临床随访。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jan;61(1):3-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24757. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
7
Detection of recurrence in childhood solid tumors.儿童实体瘤复发的检测
Cancer. 2005 Mar 15;103(6):1274-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20896.