Suppr超能文献

入门级 3D 打印机能否制作高质量的解剖模型?对桌面 3D 打印机和专业设备打印的下颌模型的准确性评估。

Can an entry-level 3D printer create high-quality anatomical models? Accuracy assessment of mandibular models printed by a desktop 3D printer and a professional device.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Medical Additive Manufacturing Research Group, Hightech Research Centre, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.

Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.962. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Abstract

This study was performed to determine whether an in-house printed mandible model is sufficiently accurate for daily clinical practice. Ten example mandible models were produced with a desktop 3D printer (fused filament fabrication, FFF) and compared with 10 equivalent mandible models fabricated using a professional-grade 3D printer (selective laser sintering, SLS). To determine the precision of the printed models, each model was scanned with an optical scanner. Subsequently, every model was compared to its original standard tessellation language (STL) file and to its corresponding analogue. Mean±standard deviation and median (interquartile range) differences were calculated. Overall these were -0.019±0.219mm and -0.007 (-0.129 to 0.107) mm for all 10 pairs. Furthermore, correlation of all printed models to their original STL files showed a high level of accuracy. Comparison of the SLS models with their STL files revealed a mean difference of -0.036±0.114mm and median difference of -0.028 (-0.093 to 0.030) mm. Comparison of the FFF models with their STL files yielded a mean difference of -0.055±0.227mm and median difference of -0.022 (-0.153 to 0.065) mm. The study findings confirm that in-house 3D printed mandible models are economically favourable as well as suitable substitutes for professional-grade models, in particular considering the geometric aspects.

摘要

本研究旨在确定内部打印的下颌模型是否足够准确,以满足日常临床实践的需要。使用桌面 3D 打印机(熔融沉积成型,FFF)制作了 10 个下颌模型,并与使用专业级 3D 打印机(选择性激光烧结,SLS)制作的 10 个等效下颌模型进行了比较。为了确定打印模型的精度,使用光学扫描仪对每个模型进行了扫描。随后,将每个模型与其原始标准三角测量语言(STL)文件和相应的模型进行了比较。计算了平均值±标准偏差和中位数(四分位数范围)差异。对于所有 10 对模型,总体差异分别为-0.019±0.219mm 和-0.007(-0.129 至 0.107)mm。此外,所有打印模型与原始 STL 文件的相关性显示出高度的准确性。将 SLS 模型与其 STL 文件进行比较,平均差异为-0.036±0.114mm,中位数差异为-0.028(-0.093 至 0.030)mm。将 FFF 模型与其 STL 文件进行比较,平均差异为-0.055±0.227mm,中位数差异为-0.022(-0.153 至 0.065)mm。研究结果证实,内部 3D 打印的下颌模型在经济上具有优势,并且是专业级模型的合适替代品,特别是在几何方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验