Suppr超能文献

单侧黑质损伤大鼠在苯丙胺和阿扑吗啡作用下转圈行为特征的差异。

Differences in the behavioral profile of circling under amphetamine and apomorphine in rats with unilateral lesions of the substantia nigra.

作者信息

Ziegler M, Szechtman H

机构信息

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 1988 Apr;102(2):276-88, 327. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.2.276.

Abstract

In rats with severe depletion of striatal dopamine, produced by a unilateral injection of 6-hydroxydopamine into the substantia nigra, amphetamine (2 mg/kg) induces circling towards the side of the lesion and apomorphine (0.25 mg/kg) induces circling in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1 we showed that under apomorphine, circling may be related to an asymmetry in stepping, but under amphetamine it is not. Specifically, under apomorphine, rats rotate almost exclusively by stepping (backwards) with the contralateral hindlimb while pivoting on the ipsilateral hindlimb. In contrast, under amphetamine, they rotate using a variety of stepping patterns, and there is no consistent asymmetry in using one hindleg for stepping and the other one for bearing weight. Considering the stepping patterns, it is suggested that rotations induced by apomorphine and amphetamine involve at least one and two variables, respectively (turning and turning plus forward progression). Furthermore, the results of Experiment 2 revealed that under apomorphine the direction of circling in a pool of water is reversed by edges, but under amphetamine it is not. In particular, under apomorphine, rats swim in the contraversive direction when in the middle of the pool but in the ipsiversive direction when swimming along the edge of the pool. In contrast, under amphetamine, they show little attraction for the edge and continue swimming in the ipsiversive direction, regardless of their position in the pool. It seems, therefore, that different behavioral mechanisms may underlie the rotations induced by apomorphine and amphetamine.

摘要

通过向黑质单侧注射6-羟基多巴胺,可使大鼠纹状体多巴胺严重耗竭。在此类大鼠中,安非他明(2毫克/千克)会诱导其向损伤侧转圈,而阿扑吗啡(0.25毫克/千克)则会诱导其向相反方向转圈。在实验1中我们发现,在阿扑吗啡作用下,转圈可能与步幅不对称有关,但在安非他明作用下则并非如此。具体而言,在阿扑吗啡作用下,大鼠几乎完全通过对侧后肢向后迈步,同时以同侧后肢为轴进行旋转。相比之下,在安非他明作用下,它们通过多种步幅模式进行旋转,且在使用一条后肢迈步而另一条后肢承重方面没有一致的不对称性。考虑到步幅模式,有人认为阿扑吗啡和安非他明诱导的旋转分别涉及至少一个和两个变量(转向以及转向加向前推进)。此外,实验2的结果表明,在阿扑吗啡作用下,水中转圈的方向会因边缘而反转,但在安非他明作用下则不会。特别是,在阿扑吗啡作用下,大鼠在水池中央时会向对侧游动,但沿着水池边缘游动时会向同侧游动。相比之下,在安非他明作用下,它们对边缘几乎没有吸引力,无论在水池中的位置如何,都会继续向同侧游动。因此,阿扑吗啡和安非他明诱导的旋转似乎可能存在不同的行为机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验