Des Jarlais D C, Friedman S R
New York State Division of Substance Abuse Services, NY 10027.
AIDS. 1987 Jul;1(2):67-76.
Research on the epidemiology of HIV infection among IV drug users is still at a relatively early stage. Multilocation studies that would permit better geographic comparisons are greatly needed. Multi-method studies within single geographic areas are also needed to assess possible biases with respect to sample recruitment and data collection procedures. The continuation of the epidemic provides a changing historical context that complicates any comparisons. Despite these problems, there are some consistencies that can be seen across studies. Studies of HIV seroprevalence among IV drug users show wide variation among cities in the United States and Europe. The time that the virus was introduced into the IV drug using group within the city is one factor in explaining these differences; other cross-city factors have yet to be identified. Once HIV has been introduced into the IV drug use group within a particular geographic area, there is the possibility of rapid spread up to seroprevalence levels of 50% or greater. Thus, a currently low seroprevalence rate should not be seen as a stable situation. Frequency of injection and sharing of equipment with multiple other drug users (particularly at shooting galleries) have been frequently associated with HIV exposure. Being female, ethnicity (in the USA) and engaging in prostitution also may be associated with increased risk for HIV exposure, suggesting that prevention programs should include special consideration of sex and ethnic differences. Studies of AIDS risk reduction show that substantial proportions of IV drug users are changing their behavior to avoid exposure to HIV. This risk reduction is probably more advanced in New York, with its high seroprevalence and incidence of cases, but is also occurring in cities with lower seroprevalence and limited numbers of cases. The primary forms of risk reduction are increasing the use of sterile equipment, reducing the number of needle sharing partners, and reducing the frequency of injection. These behavior changes are very similar to the frequently identified behavioral risk factors associated with HIV exposure, suggesting that they should be effective in at least slowing the spread of HIV among IV drug users. No linkage of risk reduction to decreases in seroconversion has yet been shown, however, and greater risk reduction is clearly required. A variety of prevention strategies will probably be needed to reduce the spread of HIV among IV drug users. Prevention of initiation into drug injection is an undeniable long-term goal for the control of HIV infection, but there is very little research being conducted in this area.
对静脉注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒感染流行病学的研究仍处于相对早期阶段。非常需要能够进行更好地理比较的多地点研究。还需要在单一地理区域内开展多方法研究,以评估样本招募和数据收集程序方面可能存在的偏差。疫情的持续发展提供了不断变化的历史背景,这使得任何比较都变得复杂。尽管存在这些问题,但各项研究之间仍有一些一致性。对静脉注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒血清流行率的研究表明,美国和欧洲各城市之间存在很大差异。病毒在城市内被引入静脉注射吸毒群体的时间是解释这些差异的一个因素;其他跨城市因素尚待确定。一旦艾滋病毒被引入特定地理区域内的静脉注射吸毒群体,就有可能迅速传播,血清流行率达到50%或更高。因此,当前较低的血清流行率不应被视为一种稳定状态。注射频率以及与多个其他吸毒者共用设备(尤其是在射击馆)常常与艾滋病毒暴露有关。女性、种族(在美国)以及从事卖淫活动也可能与艾滋病毒暴露风险增加有关,这表明预防方案应特别考虑性别和种族差异。对降低艾滋病风险的研究表明,相当一部分静脉注射吸毒者正在改变其行为以避免接触艾滋病毒。在纽约,这种风险降低可能更为明显,因为那里的血清流行率和病例发病率都很高,但在血清流行率较低且病例数量有限的城市也在发生。降低风险的主要形式包括增加使用无菌设备、减少共用针头的伙伴数量以及降低注射频率。这些行为改变与经常确定的与艾滋病毒暴露相关的行为风险因素非常相似,这表明它们至少应能有效减缓艾滋病毒在静脉注射吸毒者中的传播。然而,尚未显示降低风险与血清转化减少之间存在关联,显然还需要更大程度地降低风险。可能需要多种预防策略来减少艾滋病毒在静脉注射吸毒者中的传播。预防开始静脉注射吸毒是控制艾滋病毒感染不可否认的长期目标,但该领域的研究非常少。