Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Department of Industrial Engineering, Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Italy.
Clin Anat. 2019 Oct;32(7):948-960. doi: 10.1002/ca.23435. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Ultrasound (US) imaging is being increasingly used by Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) specialists to measure the thickness of abdominal muscles. The current study set out to assess the inter-rater reliability of US measurements of the thickness of the abdominal muscles/fasciae. Three raters (1 = orthopedic specialist, expert on fasciae; 2 = PRM resident; 3 = PRM specialist) with different levels of US training examined the abdominal muscles and fasciae of a healthy volunteer under supine resting and dynamic conditions following a standard US protocol. The probe was positioned along the right lateral abdominal wall at the height of the 12th rib: (1) above the umbilicus at the linea alba, (2) to the side of and approximately 2 cm from the umbilicus, (3) along the mammillary line, and (4) along the anterior axillary line. Each rater measured 17 anatomical structures six times during two sessions. The relative error of the measurements (intra-rater variability) was slightly higher for the fasciae than for the muscles, and during the dynamic condition than the resting condition. Inter-rater reliability was good under both conditions for the fasciae (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = ICC = 0.83) and excellent for the muscles (ICC = 0.99). Knowledge of the fascial anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential for accurate ultrasound examinations and for improving reliability. These findings confirm that US imaging is a reliable, non-invasive, cost-effective instrument for evaluating the abdominal muscles/fasciae. Clin. Anat. 32:948-960, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
超声(US)成像正被物理医学与康复(PRM)专家越来越多地用于测量腹部肌肉的厚度。本研究旨在评估 US 测量腹部肌肉/筋膜厚度的观察者间可靠性。3 名观察者(1 = 骨科专家,筋膜专家;2 = PRM 住院医师;3 = PRM 专家)接受了不同水平的 US 培训,根据标准 US 协议,在仰卧休息和动态条件下检查了健康志愿者的腹部肌肉和筋膜。探头沿右侧侧腹壁在第 12 肋高度定位:(1)白线在脐上,(2)脐旁约 2cm,(3)沿乳线,(4)沿腋前线。每个观察者在两次测量中对 17 个解剖结构进行了 6 次测量。与肌肉相比,筋膜的测量相对误差(观察者内变异性)略高,在动态条件下比在休息条件下高。在两种条件下,筋膜的观察者间可靠性均良好(组内相关系数=ICC=0.83),肌肉的观察者间可靠性极佳(ICC=0.99)。了解腹壁的筋膜解剖对于准确的超声检查和提高可靠性至关重要。这些发现证实,US 成像对于评估腹部肌肉/筋膜是一种可靠、无创、具有成本效益的仪器。临床解剖学 32:948-960,2019。©2019 年 Wiley 期刊公司