START Midwest, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Department of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Oncology University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Dec;22(12):1740-1751. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00584-2. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
BACKGROUND: Both innate and adaptive immune responses are important components of anticancer immunity. The CD47-SIRPα interaction could represent an important pathway used by tumour cells to evade immune surveillance. We aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and anticancer activity of evorpacept (also known as ALX148), a high-affinity CD47-blocking protein with an inactive IgG Fc region in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: We did a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study at nine hospitals and one clinic in the USA and Korea. Eligible patients for the dose-escalation and safety lead-in phases were aged 18 years or older with histological or cytological diagnosis of advanced or metastatic solid tumours with no available standard therapy, measurable or unmeasurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. In the dose-escalation phase, which used a 3 + 3 design, patients received intravenous evorpacept at either 0·3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg once per week in 21-day cycles, or 30 mg/kg once every other week in 28-day cycles. In the safety lead-in phase, patients were given the maximum tolerable dose of evorpacept from the dose-escalation phase plus either intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg administered once every 3 weeks) or intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks). In the dose-expansion phase, additional patients aged 18 years or older with second-line or later-line advanced malignancies were enrolled into three parallel cohorts: those with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and those with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were given the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept plus intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg administered once every 3 weeks), and patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer were given the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) until disease progression, voluntary withdrawal from the study, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept administered as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab, measured by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle, and was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of evorpacept. Secondary outcomes included the safety, tolerability, and antitumour activity of evorpacept, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab. The primary outcome, safety, and tolerability were assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of evorpacept, and antitumour activity was assessed in those who recieved at least one dose of study treatment and underwent at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03013218. FINDINGS: Between March 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2019, 110 patients received single-agent evorpacept (n=28), evorpacept plus pembrolizumab (n=52), or evorpacept plus trastuzumab (n=30), and were included in the safety analysis. Median follow-up was 29·1 months (95% CI not calculable [NC]-NC) in the single-agent cohort, 27·0 months (25·1-28·8) in the evorpacept plus pembrolizumab cohort, and 32·7 months (27·0-32·7) in the evorpacept plus trastuzumab cohort. Two (7%) dose-limiting toxicities in the first cycle were reported in patients who received single-agent evorpacept; neutropenia with an associated infection in one patient with gastroesophageal junction cancer who received 3 mg/kg once per week, and thrombocytopenia with associated bleeding in one patient with pancreatic cancer who received 30 mg/kg once every other week. No maximum tolerated dose was reached; the maximum administered doses were 10 mg/kg once per week or 30 mg/kg once every other week. The 10 mg/kg once per week dose was used in the expansion cohorts in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia with single-agent evorpacept (two [7%] patients) and evorpacept plus pembrolizumab (two [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [7%]) and neutropenia (two [7%]) with evorpacept plus trastuzumab. In patients who received single-agent evorpacept, four treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Five serious treatment-related adverse events related to evorpacept plus pembrolizumab were reported, and one serious adverse event related to evorpacept plus trastuzumab was reported. In response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation phase (n=15) receiving single-agent evorpacept once per week, four (27%) had a best overall response of stable disease (two received 0·3 mg/kg, one received 3 mg/kg, and one received 10 mg/kg); in the 11 patients who received single-agent evorpacept at the highest dose of 30 mg/kg once every other week, two (18%) had stable disease. In the dose-expansion cohort, overall responses were recorded in four (20·0%; 95% CI 5·7-43·7) of 20 patients with HNSCC who received evorpacept plus pembrolizumab, in one (5·0%; 0·1-24·9) of 20 patients with NSCLC who received evorpacept plus pembrolizumab, and in four (21·1%; 6·1-45·6) of 19 patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who received evorpacept plus trastuzumab. INTERPRETATION: The safety findings support the use of evorpacept in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab for patients with advanced solid tumours. Preliminary antitumour activity results support future investigation of evorpacept combined with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab in patients with HNSCC, gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, and NSCLC. FUNDING: ALX Oncology.
背景:先天免疫和适应性免疫反应都是抗癌免疫的重要组成部分。CD47-SIRPα 相互作用可能是肿瘤细胞逃避免疫监视的重要途径。我们旨在评估 evorpacept(也称为 ALX148)在实体瘤患者中的安全性、药代动力学、药效学和抗癌活性,这是一种具有无活性 IgG Fc 区的高亲和力 CD47 阻断蛋白。
方法:我们在美国和韩国的 9 家医院和 1 家诊所进行了首次人体、开放性、多中心、1 期剂量递增和剂量扩展研究。剂量递增和安全性导入阶段的入组标准为年龄 18 岁或以上,组织学或细胞学诊断为晚期或转移性实体瘤,无可用的标准治疗方法,根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 可测量或不可测量疾病,以及东部肿瘤协作组表现状态评分为 0 或 1。在剂量递增阶段,采用 3+3 设计,患者以 0.3、1、3 或 10 mg/kg 的剂量每周一次,每 21 天周期,或 30 mg/kg 每 28 天周期接受静脉注射 evorpacept。在安全性导入阶段,患者接受来自剂量递增阶段的最大耐受剂量的 evorpacept,外加静脉注射 pembrolizumab(每 3 周给予 200 mg)或静脉注射曲妥珠单抗(首剂 8 mg/kg,随后每 3 周给予 6 mg/kg)。在剂量扩展阶段,另外招募了 18 岁或以上的二线或后线晚期恶性肿瘤的 18 岁或以上患者,进入三个平行队列:头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受最大耐受剂量的 evorpacept,外加静脉注射 pembrolizumab(每 3 周给予 200 mg),HER2 阳性胃或胃食管交界处癌患者接受最大耐受剂量的 evorpacept,外加静脉注射曲妥珠单抗(首剂 8 mg/kg,随后每 3 周给予 6 mg/kg),直至疾病进展、自愿退出研究或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点是作为单一药物和与 pembrolizumab 或曲妥珠单抗联合使用的 evorpacept 的最大耐受剂量,通过第一个周期中发生的剂量限制性毒性来衡量,并在至少接受一剂 evorpacept 的所有患者中进行评估。次要终点包括 evorpacept 的安全性、耐受性和抗肿瘤活性,无论是单独使用还是与 pembrolizumab 或曲妥珠单抗联合使用。主要结局、安全性和耐受性在至少接受一剂 evorpacept 的所有患者中进行评估,抗肿瘤活性在至少接受一剂研究治疗且至少进行了一次基线后肿瘤评估的患者中进行评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT03013218。
结果:2017 年 3 月 6 日至 2019 年 2 月 21 日,110 名患者接受了单药 evorpacept(n=28)、evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab(n=52)或 evorpacept 联合曲妥珠单抗(n=30)治疗,并纳入安全性分析。在单药队列中,中位随访时间为 29.1 个月(95%CI 未计算[NC]-NC),在 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab 队列中为 27.0 个月(25.1-28.8),在 evorpacept 联合曲妥珠单抗队列中为 32.7 个月(27.0-32.7)。两名(7%)患者在接受单药 evorpacept 时报告了第一个周期中的 2 例剂量限制毒性;一名接受每周 3mg/kg 剂量的胃食管交界处癌患者发生中性粒细胞减少伴相关感染,一名接受每两周 30mg/kg 剂量的胰腺癌患者发生血小板减少伴相关出血。未达到最大耐受剂量;最高给药剂量为每周 10mg/kg 或每两周 30mg/kg。在扩展队列中,每周 10mg/kg 或每两周 30mg/kg 的剂量与 pembrolizumab 或曲妥珠单抗联合使用。单药 evorpacept 最常见的 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件为血小板减少(2 例[7%]患者)和 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab(2 例[4%]),以及 evorpacept 联合曲妥珠单抗(2 例[7%])和中性粒细胞减少(2 例[7%])。在接受单药 evorpacept 的患者中,报告了 4 例与治疗相关的严重不良事件。报告了 5 例与 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab 相关的严重治疗相关不良事件,报告了 1 例与 evorpacept 联合曲妥珠单抗相关的严重不良事件。在剂量递增阶段(n=15)接受每周一次单药 evorpacept 的可评估反应患者中,4 例(27%)最佳总体反应为疾病稳定(2 例接受 0.3mg/kg,1 例接受 3mg/kg,1 例接受 10mg/kg);在接受每两周 30mg/kg 最高剂量的 11 例患者中,2 例(18%)疾病稳定。在剂量扩展队列中,在接受 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab 的 20 例 HNSCC 患者中,4 例(20.0%;95%CI 5.7-43.7)观察到总体反应,在接受 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab 的 20 例 NSCLC 患者中,1 例(5.0%;0.1-24.9)观察到总体反应,在接受 evorpacept 联合曲妥珠单抗的 19 例胃或胃食管交界处癌患者中,4 例(21.1%;6.1-45.6)观察到总体反应。
解释:安全性发现支持 evorpacept 与 pembrolizumab 或曲妥珠单抗联合用于治疗晚期实体瘤患者。初步抗肿瘤活性结果支持未来在 HNSCC、胃癌或胃食管交界处癌和 NSCLC 患者中进一步研究 evorpacept 联合 pembrolizumab 或曲妥珠单抗。
资金来源:ALX Oncology。
Clin Cancer Res. 2025-7-29
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025-5-29
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025-5-22
Immunother Adv. 2025-3-11