Shukla Rajeev, Champawat Vishal Singh, Jain Ravi Kant
Department of Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Oct;22(5):278-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
In medical colleges, resident training programs must provide adequate surgical experiences, making them qualified at the end of residency program. It is generally believed that it would take more time for a surgical resident to perform surgical procedures than a board-certified surgeon. There is no current benchmark with regards to operative time and surgical cases involving orthopedic surgery residents. In this study, we focused on two key aspects of surgical training variables, namely, surgical duration & C-arm shoots when the procedure is done by a faculty surgeon in comparison to done by an orthopedic resident under supervision of faculty surgeon.
It is an observational prospective study, we observed patients undergoing 1 of 5 common orthopedic trauma operations in a community teaching hospital. We recorded two variables, 'skin to skin' surgical duration & number of image intensifier television/C-arm shoots of faculty surgeons and orthopedic resident (postgraduate-3yr) under supervision of faculty surgeon. We calculated mean difference of two variables with or without resident & determined statistical significance, we also compared functional outcome at final follow-up.
The total number of procedure observed was 402. On observing summarized results of all surgical procedures, faculty surgeons took on an average 33 min lesser (p < 0.05) & on an average 37 lesser number of shoots (p < 0.05) than resident surgeons. The difference in surgical duration tended to increase with the greater complexity of the surgical dissection. The difference in number of C-arm shoots tended to increase with the increase in surgical duration in closed procedures. In all the five procedures there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in functional outcome of cases performed by faulty surgeon and resident.
Little data has been previously published regarding the impact of teaching orthopedic resident in operating room. We demonstrate that resident participation increases the procedure time for commonly performed orthopedic procedures and also the number of C-arm shoots, hence there is a need for technical training facilities outside the operating room such as in cadaveric labs, saw bone labs & virtual surgery simulation. Also the preoperative plan should be thoroughly discussed by faculty surgeon with residents.
在医学院校中,住院医师培训项目必须提供足够的外科手术经验,使他们在住院医师培训结束时具备资质。人们普遍认为,外科住院医师实施外科手术的时间要比获得委员会认证的外科医生长。目前尚无关于骨科住院医师手术时间和手术病例的基准。在本研究中,我们聚焦于外科培训变量的两个关键方面,即由带教外科医生实施手术与在带教外科医生监督下由骨科住院医师实施手术时的手术时长和C形臂照射次数。
这是一项观察性前瞻性研究,我们观察了在一家社区教学医院接受5种常见骨科创伤手术之一的患者。我们记录了两个变量,即“皮肤到皮肤”的手术时长以及带教外科医生和在带教外科医生监督下的骨科住院医师(研究生三年级)的影像增强电视/C形臂照射次数。我们计算了有或没有住院医师参与时两个变量的平均差异并确定统计学意义,我们还比较了最终随访时的功能结果。
观察到的手术总数为402例。在观察所有外科手术的汇总结果时,带教外科医生的平均手术时间比住院医师少33分钟(p<0.05),平均照射次数比住院医师少37次(p<0.05)。手术持续时间的差异往往随着手术解剖复杂性的增加而增大。在闭合手术中,C形臂照射次数的差异往往随着手术持续时间的增加而增大。在所有五种手术中,带教外科医生和住院医师所做病例的功能结果没有显著差异(p>0.05)。
此前关于在手术室带教骨科住院医师的影响的发表数据很少。我们证明,住院医师的参与会增加常见骨科手术的手术时间以及C形臂照射次数,因此需要在手术室之外提供技术培训设施,如尸体实验室、锯骨实验室和虚拟手术模拟。此外,带教外科医生应与住院医师充分讨论术前计划。