Rangarajan K, Pucher P H, Armstrong T, Bateman A, Hamady Zzr
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Department of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Southampton, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Sep;101(7):453-462. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0060. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite advances in surgery and systemic therapies. Neoadjuvant therapy strategies are a promising alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, their role remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with a surgery first approach (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, together with pooling of unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve data.
A total of 533 studies were identified that analysed the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final data synthesis. Meta-analysis suggested beneficial effects of neoadjuvant therapy with prolonged survival compared with a surgery-first approach, (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.76). In addition, R0 resection rates were significantly higher in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (relative risk 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.55). Individual patient data analysis suggested that overall survival was better for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy ( = 0.008).
Current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on overall survival in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in comparison with upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. Further trials are needed to address the need for practice change.
尽管手术和全身治疗取得了进展,但胰腺导管腺癌仍然是一种预后较差的疾病。新辅助治疗策略是辅助化疗的一种有前景的替代方案。然而,其作用仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在阐明新辅助治疗在可切除胰腺导管腺癌中的益处。
从MEDLINE、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆中检索符合条件的研究。纳入比较新辅助治疗与先行手术方法(有或无辅助治疗)在可切除胰腺导管腺癌中的研究。评估的主要结局是总生存期。进行随机效应荟萃分析,并汇总未调整的Kaplan-Meier曲线数据。
共识别出533项分析新辅助治疗对胰腺导管腺癌疗效的研究。最终数据合成纳入了27项研究。荟萃分析表明,与先行手术方法相比,新辅助治疗可延长生存期,具有有益效果(风险比0.72,95%置信区间0.69-0.76)。此外,接受新辅助治疗的患者R0切除率显著更高(相对风险0.51,95%置信区间0.47-0.55)。个体患者数据分析表明,接受新辅助治疗的患者总生存期更好(P = 0.008)。
当前证据表明,与先行手术和辅助治疗相比,新辅助化疗对可切除胰腺导管腺癌的总生存期具有有益影响。需要进一步试验以满足实践改变的需求。