Lintzeris Nicholas, Bhardwaj Anjali, Mills Llewellyn, Dunlop Adrian, Copeland Jan, McGregor Iain, Bruno Raimondo, Gugusheff Jessica, Phung Nghi, Montebello Mark, Chan Therese, Kirby Adrienne, Hall Michelle, Jefferies Meryem, Luksza Jennifer, Shanahan Marian, Kevin Richard, Allsop David
Drug and Alcohol Services, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Discipline Addiction Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1242-1253. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1993.
There are no effective medications for treating dependence on cannabis.
To examine the safety and efficacy of nabiximols in the treatment of patients with cannabis dependence.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing nabiximols with placebo in a 12-week, multisite outpatient study recruited participants from February 3, 2016, to June 14, 2017, at 4 outpatient specialist alcohol and drug treatment services in New South Wales, Australia. Participants had cannabis dependence (as defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision) and were seeking treatment, were nonresponsive to prior treatment attempts, were 18 to 64 years of age, had no other substance use disorder, had no severe medical or psychiatric conditions, were not pregnant, were not mandated by a court to undergo treatment, and provided informed consent. Results for primary efficacy measures and all secondary outcomes were obtained using a modified intention-to-treat data set.
Participants received 12-week treatment involving weekly clinical reviews, structured counseling, and flexible medication doses-up to 32 sprays daily (tetrahydrocannabinol, 86.4 mg, and cannabidiol, 80 mg), dispensed weekly.
Primary outcome was self-reported number of days using illicit cannabis during the 12-week period. Other outcomes included alternate cannabis use parameters (periods of abstinence, withdrawal, cravings, and problems), safety parameters (adverse events and aberrant medication use), health status, other substance use, and treatment retention.
A total of 128 participants (30 women and 98 men; mean [SD] age, 35.0 [10.9] years) were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants had used a mean (SD) of 2.3 (2.1) g of cannabis on a mean (SD) of 25.7 (4.5) days in the past 28 days. Treatment retention was comparable for the 2 groups (placebo, 30 of 67 participants [44.8%]; nabiximols, 30 of 61 participants [49.2%]), and both groups used similar mean (SD) doses (placebo, 18.5 [9.5] sprays daily; nabiximols, 17.6 [9.5] sprays daily, equivalent to a mean [SD] of 47.5 [25.7] mg of tetrahydrocannabinol and 44.0 [23.8] mg of cannabidiol). For the primary end point, the placebo group reported significantly more days using cannabis during the 12 weeks (mean [SD], 53.1 [33.0] days) than the nabiximols group (mean [SD], 35.0 [32.4] days; estimated difference, 18.6 days; 95% CI, 3.5-33.7 days; P = .02). Both groups showed comparable improvements in health status, with no substantial changes in other substance use. Medication was well tolerated with few adverse events.
This study demonstrates that cannabinoid agonist treatment, in this case using nabiximols, in combination with psychosocial interventions is a safe approach for reducing cannabis use among individuals with cannabis dependence who are seeking treatment.
anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000103460.
目前尚无有效药物治疗大麻依赖。
研究纳比西莫尔治疗大麻依赖患者的安全性和有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项平行双盲随机临床试验在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的4家门诊专科酒精和药物治疗服务机构进行,为期12周、多地点的门诊研究,比较纳比西莫尔与安慰剂,于2016年2月3日至2017年6月14日招募参与者。参与者有大麻依赖(根据《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类》第十次修订版定义)且正在寻求治疗,对先前的治疗尝试无反应,年龄在18至64岁之间,无其他物质使用障碍,无严重的医学或精神疾病,未怀孕,未被法院强制接受治疗,并提供了知情同意书。主要疗效指标和所有次要结局的结果使用改良的意向性分析数据集获得。
参与者接受为期12周的治疗,包括每周临床复查、结构化咨询和灵活的药物剂量,每日最多32喷(四氢大麻酚86.4毫克,大麻二酚80毫克),每周分发一次。
主要结局是自我报告的12周内使用非法大麻的天数。其他结局包括替代的大麻使用参数(禁欲期、戒断期、渴望和问题)、安全性参数(不良事件和异常用药)、健康状况、其他物质使用和治疗保留率。
共有128名参与者(30名女性和98名男性;平均[标准差]年龄35.0[10.9]岁)被随机分组并接受至少1剂研究药物。在过去28天里,参与者平均(标准差)使用2.3(2.1)克大麻,平均(标准差)使用25.7(4.5)天。两组的治疗保留率相当(安慰剂组,67名参与者中的30名[44.8%];纳比西莫尔组,61名参与者中的30名[49.2%]),两组使用的平均(标准差)剂量相似(安慰剂组,每日18.5[9.5]喷;纳比西莫尔组,每日17.6[9.5]喷,相当于平均[标准差]47.5[25.7]毫克四氢大麻酚和44.0[23.8]毫克大麻二酚)。对于主要终点,安慰剂组在12周内报告使用大麻的天数(平均[标准差],53.1[33.0]天)显著多于纳比西莫尔组(平均[标准差],35.0[32.4]天;估计差异,18.6天;95%置信区间,3.5 - 33.7天;P = 0.02)。两组在健康状况方面有相似的改善,其他物质使用方面无实质性变化。药物耐受性良好,不良事件较少。
本研究表明,在这种情况下使用纳比西莫尔的大麻素激动剂治疗与心理社会干预相结合,对于寻求治疗的大麻依赖个体来说,是一种减少大麻使用的安全方法。
anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12616000103460。