• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)在甲状腺结节分类中的有效性和可重复性:多中心前瞻性研究。

The validity and reproducibility of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in categorization of thyroid nodules: Multicentre prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Radio-diagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Department of Radio-diagnosis, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2019 Aug;117:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.015
PMID:31307646
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess diagnostic validity and reproducibility of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for interpretation of thyroid nodules by thyroid ultrasonography (US).

METHOD

A prospective multicentre study initially included 557 patients with clinically suspected thyroid nodules. After exclusion, a final cohort of 380 patients with 948 thyroid nodules detected by US were enrolled. Based on American College of Radiology (ACR) TI-RADS, three radiologists analysed all US examinations independently and assigned a TI-RADS category to each thyroid nodule. The final diagnosis was based on cytology which was used as reference standard for calculating diagnostic performance of TI-RADS for predicting malignant thyroid nodules. The Fleiss and weighted kappa (κ) statistics were applied to assess inter-observer agreement of morphological features and TI-RADS scoring results for thyroid nodules. Additionally, we made a simple screening among referring clinicians to assess the clinical response to application of TI-RADS.

RESULTS

A total of 948 thyroid nodules were evaluated; 136 (14.3%) were malignant, and 812 (85.7%) were benign. The papillary carcinoma was the most common malignant thyroid nodules (81.6%). The best cut-off value for predicting malignant thyroid nodules was > TR3. On a lesion-based analysis, the TI-RADS had a sensitivity, specificity, and an accuracy of 98.3%, 90.9%, and 92.1%, respectively when regarding those thyroid nodules classified as > TR3 for predicting malignancy. The inter-observer agreement of the TI-RADS category was good (κ = 0.636). Ninety percent of referring clinicians accept TI-RADS.

CONCLUSIONS

TI-RADS improves diagnostic performance of US for predicting malignant thyroid nodules with high validity and high reproducibility.

摘要

目的

评估甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)在甲状腺超声检查(US)诊断甲状腺结节中的诊断准确性和可重复性。

方法

一项前瞻性多中心研究最初纳入了 557 例临床怀疑患有甲状腺结节的患者。排除后,最终纳入了 380 例经 US 检测到 948 个甲状腺结节的患者。基于美国放射学院(ACR)TI-RADS,三位放射科医生独立分析了所有 US 检查,并为每个甲状腺结节分配了 TI-RADS 类别。最终诊断基于细胞学,细胞学被用作计算 TI-RADS 预测恶性甲状腺结节的诊断性能的参考标准。采用 Fleiss 和加权κ(κ)统计评估了观察者间对甲状腺结节形态特征和 TI-RADS 评分结果的一致性。此外,我们对参考医生进行了简单的筛查,以评估 TI-RADS 应用的临床反应。

结果

共评估了 948 个甲状腺结节,其中 136 个(14.3%)为恶性,812 个(85.7%)为良性。甲状腺乳头状癌是最常见的恶性甲状腺结节(81.6%)。预测恶性甲状腺结节的最佳截断值为>TR3。在基于病变的分析中,当将 TI-RADS 分类为>TR3 的甲状腺结节用于预测恶性时,TI-RADS 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 98.3%、90.9%和 92.1%。TI-RADS 类别的观察者间一致性较好(κ=0.636)。90%的参考医生接受 TI-RADS。

结论

TI-RADS 提高了 US 预测恶性甲状腺结节的诊断性能,具有较高的有效性和可重复性。

相似文献

1
The validity and reproducibility of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in categorization of thyroid nodules: Multicentre prospective study.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)在甲状腺结节分类中的有效性和可重复性:多中心前瞻性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Aug;117:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
Reduction in Thyroid Nodule Biopsies and Improved Accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统可减少甲状腺结节活检并提高准确性。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):185-193. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172572. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)评分较高是否预示恶性风险增加?评估甲状腺结节时 ACR TI-RADS 与细针穿刺细胞学的相关性研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jul;128(7):470-481. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22254. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
The use of modified TI-RADS using contrast-enhanced ultrasound features for classification purposes in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A prospective and multi-center study.使用改良的 TI-RADS 联合超声造影特征对甲状腺良恶性结节进行分类诊断的前瞻性多中心研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 1;14:1080908. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1080908. eCollection 2023.
5
Analysis of Malignant Thyroid Nodules That Do Not Meet ACR TI-RADS Criteria for Fine-Needle Aspiration.不符合 ACR TI-RADS 细针抽吸标准的甲状腺恶性结节分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Feb;216(2):471-478. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23123. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Assessment of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS™) with modification of the management recommendations for pediatric thyroid nodules.评估美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS™),并修改儿科甲状腺结节的管理建议。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Aug;54(9):1476-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05982-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
7
Clinical Study of the Prediction of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: Modified Score versus 2017 American College of Radiology's Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Lexicon.甲状腺结节良恶性预测的临床研究:改良评分与 2017 年美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统超声词汇的比较。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1627-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检适应证:一种基于点的风险分层系统与一种基于模式的风险分层系统比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4871-4878. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5992-z. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Assessment of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification in a Pediatric Population.评估美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在儿科人群中甲状腺结节恶性风险分层的应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):188-194. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20099. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
A DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS.ATA 和 TI-RADS 超声评分系统的直接比较。
Endocr Pract. 2019 May;25(5):413-422. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0369. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the ultrasound findings of thyroid gland enlargement in Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A retrospective cross-sectional study.加纳海岸角教学医院甲状腺肿大超声检查结果评估:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 9;7(5):e2090. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2090. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS combined with superb microvascular imaging for differential diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules and papillary thyroid carcinomas.美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR-TIRADS)联合超微血管成像对木乃伊化甲状腺结节与甲状腺乳头状癌鉴别诊断的诊断效能
Endocr Connect. 2024 Feb 7;13(3). doi: 10.1530/EC-23-0388. Print 2024 Mar 1.
3
Malignancy Rates in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (TI-RADS 3) Thyroid Nodules: A Retrospective Study.
甲状腺影像报告和数据系统3类(TI-RADS 3)甲状腺结节的恶性率:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 12;15(11):e48705. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48705. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
A comprehensive comparative assessment of eight risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules in the elderly population.老年人群甲状腺结节八种风险分层系统的综合比较评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 15;13:1265973. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265973. eCollection 2023.
5
Relationship Between Sonographic Findings, Fine Needle Aspiration, and Histopathological Findings of Post-thyroid Surgery.甲状腺手术后超声检查结果、细针穿刺及组织病理学检查结果之间的关系
Cureus. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):e46133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46133. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Real-Time Ultrasonography and the Evaluation of Static Images Yield Different Results in the Assessment of EU-TIRADS Categories.实时超声检查与静态图像评估在EU-TIRADS分类评估中产生不同结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 6;12(18):5809. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185809.
7
Comparison of diagnostic performance of two ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.两种甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统诊断性能的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Radiol Med. 2023 Nov;128(11):1407-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01709-3. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
8
The use of modified TI-RADS using contrast-enhanced ultrasound features for classification purposes in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A prospective and multi-center study.使用改良的 TI-RADS 联合超声造影特征对甲状腺良恶性结节进行分类诊断的前瞻性多中心研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 1;14:1080908. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1080908. eCollection 2023.
9
Validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Children.美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在儿童中的有效性。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Sep;133(9):2394-2401. doi: 10.1002/lary.30425. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
10
Changes in thyroid nodule cytology rates after institutional implementation of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统实施后甲状腺结节细胞学检查率的变化。
Surgery. 2023 Jan;173(1):232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.061. Epub 2022 Oct 14.