Andersson Erik, Langemeyer Johannes, Borgström Sara, McPhearson Timon, Haase Dagmar, Kronenberg Jakub, Barton David N, Davis McKenna, Naumann Sandra, Röschel Lina, Baró Francesc
Stockholm Resilience Centre, at Stockholm University, in Stockholm, Sweden.
North-West University, in Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Bioscience. 2019 Jul 1;69(7):566-574. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz058. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
The circumstances under which different ecosystem service benefits can be realized differ. The benefits tend to be coproduced and to be enabled by multiple interacting social, ecological, and technological factors, which is particularly evident in cities. As many cities are undergoing rapid change, these factors need to be better understood and accounted for, especially for those most in need of benefits. We propose a framework of three systemic filters that affect the flow of ecosystem service benefits: the interactions among green, blue, and built infrastructures; the regulatory power and governance of institutions; and people's individual and shared perceptions and values. We argue that more fully connecting green and blue infrastructure to its urban systems context and highlighting dynamic interactions among the three filters are key to understanding how and why ecosystem services have variable distribution, continuing inequities in who benefits, and the long-term resilience of the flows of benefits.
不同生态系统服务效益得以实现的环境各不相同。这些效益往往是共同产生的，并由多种相互作用的社会、生态和技术因素促成，这在城市中尤为明显。由于许多城市正在经历快速变革，这些因素需要得到更好的理解和考量，特别是对于那些最需要效益的方面。我们提出了一个由三个系统过滤器组成的框架，这些过滤器会影响生态系统服务效益的流动：绿色、蓝色和人工基础设施之间的相互作用；机构的监管权力和治理；以及人们的个人和共同认知与价值观。我们认为，将绿色和蓝色基础设施更全面地与其城市系统背景相联系，并突出这三个过滤器之间的动态相互作用，是理解生态系统服务为何以及如何具有分布不均、受益者持续存在不平等现象以及效益流动的长期恢复力的关键。
