Centre for Biological Engineering, Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough Univeristy, Epinal Way, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
Cell Tissue Res. 2019 Dec;378(3):399-410. doi: 10.1007/s00441-019-03069-9. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain and disability. Regenerative therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide an option for OA treatment as it could potentially regenerate the damaged cartilage. Bone marrow, adipose tissue and synovium are common MSC sources. The aim is to compare the therapeutic effect of MSCs from bone marrow, adipose tissue and synovium; combining its differentiation potential and accessibility, to decide the optimal source of MSCs for the treatment of knee OA. A comparison of preclinical and clinical studies using MSCs has been made with regard to treatment outcomes, isolation procedure and differentiation potential. All types of MSCs are effective at improving the clinical and structural condition of OA patients, but the longevity of the treatment, i.e. an effect that is maintained for at least 2 years, cannot be guaranteed. This review highlighted great variations in selection criteria and culture expansion conditions of MSCs between the literature and clinical trials. It also emphasised a substantial diversity and lack of consistency in the assessment mythology of clinical outcome after completion of MSC therapies procedures. A more cohesive methodology is required to evaluate the outcome of MSC treatments using quantitative and standardised frameworks in order to be able to directly compare results. Larger population of patients are recommended to assess the quality of MSC when designing studies and clinical trials to reaffirm the efficacy of MSC treatment prior to and within the clinical trials and follow up studies.
骨关节炎(OA)是慢性疼痛和残疾的常见原因。使用间充质干细胞(MSCs)的再生疗法为 OA 治疗提供了一种选择,因为它有可能再生受损的软骨。骨髓、脂肪组织和滑膜是常见的 MSC 来源。目的是比较骨髓、脂肪组织和滑膜来源的 MSCs 的治疗效果;结合其分化潜能和可及性,以确定治疗膝骨关节炎的最佳 MSC 来源。已经对使用 MSCs 的临床前和临床研究进行了比较,以比较治疗结果、分离程序和分化潜能。所有类型的 MSCs 都能有效改善 OA 患者的临床和结构状况,但不能保证治疗的持久性,即至少 2 年的效果。本综述强调了文献和临床试验之间在 MSC 选择标准和培养扩增条件方面存在很大差异。它还强调了在 MSC 治疗后完成后,在临床结果评估神话方面存在实质性的多样性和缺乏一致性。需要更具凝聚力的方法学来评估 MSC 治疗的结果,使用定量和标准化框架,以便能够直接比较结果。建议设计研究和临床试验时使用更大的患者群体来评估 MSC 的质量,以在临床试验和随访研究之前和期间重新确认 MSC 治疗的疗效。
Cell Tissue Res. 2019-7-15
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018-8-29
Am J Sports Med. 2017-11-3
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020-12
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-6-17
Bioeng Transl Med. 2024-8-5
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2025-2
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024-12
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024-6-22