Jacobs Cassandra L, Cho Sun-Joo, Watson Duane G
Department of Psychology, University of California.
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;43(7):e12749. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12749.
Syntactic priming in language production is the increased likelihood of using a recently encountered syntactic structure. In this paper, we examine two theories of why speakers can be primed: error-driven learning accounts (Bock, Dell, Chang, & Onishi, 2007; Chang, Dell, & Bock, 2006) and activation-based accounts (Pickering & Branigan, 1999; Reitter, Keller, & Moore, 2011). Both theories predict that speakers should be primed by the syntactic choices of others, but only activation-based accounts predict that speakers should be able to prime themselves. Here we test whether speakers can be primed by their own productions in three behavioral experiments and find evidence of structural persistence following both comprehension and speakers' own productions. We also find that comprehension-based priming effects are larger for rarer syntactic structures than for more common ones, which is most consistent with error-driven accounts. Because neither error-driven accounts nor activation-based accounts fully explain the data, we propose a hybrid model.
语言生成中的句法启动是指使用最近遇到的句法结构的可能性增加。在本文中,我们考察了关于说话者为何会受到启动的两种理论:错误驱动学习理论(博克、戴尔、张和大西,2007;张、戴尔和博克,2006)以及基于激活的理论(皮克林和布兰尼根,1999;雷特、凯勒和摩尔,2011)。两种理论都预测说话者会受到他人句法选择的启动,但只有基于激活的理论预测说话者应该能够自我启动。在这里,我们通过三个行为实验测试说话者是否能被自己的言语所启动,并发现了在理解和说话者自身言语之后结构持续存在的证据。我们还发现,基于理解的启动效应对于较罕见的句法结构而言比对较常见的句法结构更大,这与错误驱动理论最为一致。由于错误驱动理论和基于激活的理论都不能完全解释这些数据,我们提出了一个混合模型。