• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗不孕夫妇决策性供体受孕问卷的编制与验证

Development and Validation of A Decision-Making Donor Conception Questionnaire in Iranian Infertile Couples.

作者信息

Hadizadeh-Talasaz Fatemeh, Simbar Masoumeh, Esmaily Habibollah, Latifnejad Roudsari Robab

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;13(3):215-224. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5700. Epub 2019 Jul 14.

DOI:10.22074/ijfs.2019.5700
PMID:31310076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6642430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that many infertile couples have to decide about whether or not to choose donor conception, there is no predictive scale for evaluating the process of decision-making on donor conception and its determinants in such couples. The present study was conducted to develop a decision-making questionnaire for selecting donor conception and assess its psychometric properties in Iranian infertile couples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional validation study was conducted based on the method developed by DeVellis (2012) in four steps at Milad Infertility Clinic, Mashhad, Iran. The dimensions of the concept of decisionmaking were determined in the first step based on the qualitative results obtained from 38 semi-structured in-depth interviews. Items that were appropriate for the questionnaire were developed in the second step using the qualitative data and a review of the literature. In the third step, the research team reviewed and eliminated some of the items. The fourth step evaluated the face, content and construct validity of the questionnaire through exploratory factor analysis on a sample of 220 infertile couples using convenience sampling and investigated its initial and final reliability.

RESULTS

Based on the results of the qualitative study, a pool of 170 items was developed, 101 of which were eliminated after revision due to ambiguity, repetition or their poor face and content validity and initial reliability. The questionnaire was evaluated for its construct validity with 69 items. After the exploratory factor analysis, the decisionmaking donor conception questionnaire (DMDCQ) having 51 items and seven factors, was finalized. All the factors had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.75-0.87 and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) greater than 0.7.

CONCLUSION

This study led to development of a valid and reliable scale for examining infertile couples' decisionmaking about whether or not to use donor conception as well as the determinants of this decision.

摘要

背景

尽管许多不孕夫妇必须决定是否选择供体受孕,但目前尚无评估此类夫妇供体受孕决策过程及其决定因素的预测量表。本研究旨在编制一份供体受孕选择决策问卷,并评估其在伊朗不孕夫妇中的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

本横断面验证研究基于DeVellis(2012年)开发的方法,在伊朗马什哈德的米拉德不孕诊所分四个步骤进行。第一步,根据38次半结构化深入访谈的定性结果确定决策概念的维度。第二步,利用定性数据和文献综述编制适合问卷的项目。第三步,研究团队对部分项目进行审查并剔除。第四步,通过对220对不孕夫妇样本进行探索性因子分析,评估问卷的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,并调查其初始信度和最终信度。

结果

根据定性研究结果,编制了170个项目的题库,其中101个项目在修订后因表述模糊、重复、表面效度和内容效度差以及初始信度低而被剔除。对包含69个项目的问卷进行结构效度评估。经过探索性因子分析,最终确定了包含51个项目和7个因子的供体受孕决策问卷(DMDCQ)。所有因子的Cronbach's alpha值在0.75至0.87之间,组内相关系数(ICC)大于0.7。

结论

本研究开发了一个有效且可靠的量表,用于检查不孕夫妇关于是否使用供体受孕的决策及其决策的决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680b/6642430/fb77e40ee324/Int-J-Fertil-Steril-13-215-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680b/6642430/fb77e40ee324/Int-J-Fertil-Steril-13-215-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680b/6642430/fb77e40ee324/Int-J-Fertil-Steril-13-215-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of A Decision-Making Donor Conception Questionnaire in Iranian Infertile Couples.伊朗不孕夫妇决策性供体受孕问卷的编制与验证
Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;13(3):215-224. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5700. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
2
Exploring Infertile Couples' Decisions to Disclose Donor Conception to The Future Child.探究不孕夫妇向未来孩子披露供体受孕情况的决定。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;14(3):240-246. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2020.44408. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Trying for a second chance: Iranian infertile couples' experiences after failed ART.争取第二次机会:ART 失败后伊朗不孕夫妇的经历。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jun;43(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2021.1961733. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Decision Making on the Type of Delivery Questionnaire in Iranian Women.伊朗女性分娩方式决策问卷的编制及心理测量学特性
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017 Jul;5(3):292-302.
5
Development and Validation of Attitude toward Gestational Surrogacy Scale in Iranian Infertile Couples.伊朗不孕夫妇对代孕态度量表的编制与验证
Int J Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(1):113-9. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2016.4776. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
6
Development and validation of a questionnaire to determine medical orders non-adherence: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.制定和验证用于确定医疗医嘱不遵从性的问卷:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06147-3.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of a quality of life questionnaire for infertile women: a mixed method study.不孕女性生活质量问卷的编制及心理测量学评价:混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00988-7.
8
Dropout of infertility treatments and related factors among infertile couples.不孕夫妇中断不孕治疗及其相关因素。
Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 2;17(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01048-w.
9
An Exploratory Mixed Method Study for Developing and Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills Scale (SIMBS) in Iranian Couples.一项关于开发伊朗夫妇性信息、动机与行为技能量表(SIMBS)及其心理测量特性的探索性混合方法研究。
J Res Health Sci. 2019 Jun 18;19(2):e00447.
10
Psychometric properties of revised version of the fertility adjustment scale in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology.改良版生育调整量表在接受辅助生殖技术的不孕夫妇中的心理测量特性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Women's Recovery of Postnatal Perineal Injuries Questionnaire (WRPPIQ).产后会阴损伤女性恢复情况问卷(WRPPIQ)的编制及心理测量学特性
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020 Oct;8(4):311-323. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85610.1279.
2
Exploring Infertile Couples' Decisions to Disclose Donor Conception to The Future Child.探究不孕夫妇向未来孩子披露供体受孕情况的决定。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;14(3):240-246. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2020.44408. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Concerns of Infertile Women Candidates for Egg Donation: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assisted reproductive technologies and the Iranian community attitude towards infertility.辅助生殖技术与伊朗社区对不孕症的态度。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017 Sep;20(3):204-211. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1285057. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
Embryo donation and understanding of kinship: the impact of law and policy.胚胎捐赠与亲属关系认知:法律和政策的影响
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):133-138. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew297. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
3
Embryo donation and counselling for the welfare of donors, recipients, their families and children.
卵子捐赠候选不孕女性的担忧:一项定性研究。
J Family Reprod Health. 2020 Mar;14(1):21-31.
胚胎捐赠及为捐赠者、受赠者、他们的家人和孩子的福祉提供咨询服务。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):412-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev304. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
Decision for disclosure: The experiences of Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive donation procedures.披露的决定:伊朗接受辅助生殖捐赠程序的不孕夫妇的经历
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015;18(4):265-75. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2015.1076579. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Iranian and English women's use of religion and spirituality as resources for coping with infertility.伊朗和英国女性将宗教与精神信仰作为应对不孕症的资源。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014 Jun;17(2):114-23. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2014.909610. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
The ethical, legal, and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies.现代辅助生殖技术所影响的伦理、法律和社会问题。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:686253. doi: 10.1155/2012/686253. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
Cultural and ethical challenges of assisted reproductive technologies in the management of infertility among the Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria.
Afr J Reprod Health. 2010 Jun;14(2):115-27.
8
Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test.你确定吗?:使用 4 项筛查测试评估患者的决策冲突。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Aug;56(8):e308-14.
9
The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature.不孕的体验:文献回顾。
Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Jan;32(1):140-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
10
Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies.影响辅助生殖技术可及性的全球文化和社会经济因素。
Womens Health (Lond). 2009 Jul;5(4):351-8. doi: 10.2217/whe.09.28.