Diabetes Research Center, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Nasibeh Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;60:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
Several psychosocial risk factors have been identified that increase the rate of readmission in heart failure (HF) patients. However, the impact of social isolation (SI) on the rate of readmission is unclear. Therefore, the current review focused on the impact of SI on readmission rates of patients with HF.
A Medline-based strategy was applied to search PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane library, ProQuest, and Embase from inception until November 15, 2018. We performed a meta-analysis and pooled results using random effects model. The primary outcome was the odds ratio of readmission in HF patients suffering from SI. We examined the impact of both perceived and objective SI on readmission rates. We also examined the differences in readmission rates between these concepts. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of readmission and the prevalence of SI.
From 3326 titles, 13 studies (n = 6468 participants) were eligible. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. The cumulative incidence for HF-related hospital readmission was 35.47% (95% CI: 34.29-36.67). The pooled prevalence ratio (PR, (95% CI)) was 37.31% (36.14-38.49), 31.51% (30.36-32.68), 32.82% (29.90-35.88), and 39.57% (37.73-41.45) for SI, living alone, lack of social support, and poor social network, respectively. SI was associated with a 55% greater risk of hospital readmission in patients with HF (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.39-1.73; p < .001). Our analysis did not show a significant difference in the rate of hospital readmission between perceived and objective SI.
SI is prevalent in patients with HF and seems to be consistently linked to hospital readmission in HF patients, regardless of how it is measured. Therefore, it is necessary to develop interventions to reduce the burden of SI in patients with HF.
已经确定了一些心理社会风险因素会增加心力衰竭(HF)患者的再入院率。然而,社会孤立(SI)对再入院率的影响尚不清楚。因此,本综述重点关注 SI 对 HF 患者再入院率的影响。
应用基于 Medline 的策略在 PubMed、SCOPUS、Cochrane 图书馆、ProQuest 和 Embase 上进行检索,检索时间从建库至 2018 年 11 月 15 日。我们采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析和汇总结果。主要结局是患有 SI 的 HF 患者再入院的优势比。我们研究了感知和客观 SI 对再入院率的影响。我们还研究了这些概念之间再入院率的差异。次要结局是再入院的发生率和 SI 的患病率。
从 3326 个标题中,有 13 项研究(n=6468 名参与者)符合条件。平均随访时间为 13 个月。HF 相关医院再入院的累积发生率为 35.47%(95%CI:34.29-36.67)。汇总的患病率比(PR,95%CI)分别为 37.31%(36.14-38.49)、31.51%(30.36-32.68)、32.82%(29.90-35.88)和 39.57%(37.73-41.45),分别对应 SI、独居、缺乏社会支持和不良社交网络。SI 与 HF 患者住院再入院风险增加 55%相关(OR=1.55;95%CI=1.39-1.73;p<0.001)。我们的分析并未显示感知和客观 SI 之间在医院再入院率方面存在显著差异。
SI 在 HF 患者中较为普遍,并且似乎与 HF 患者的住院再入院率始终相关,无论如何测量。因此,有必要制定干预措施来减轻 HF 患者的 SI 负担。