• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体离开安全避难所的意愿与食物和安全之间的权衡:用社会性鱼类进行的测试。

Individual willingness to leave a safe refuge and the trade-off between food and safety: a test with social fish.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Department of Biology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20190826. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0826. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2019.0826
PMID:31311474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6661362/
Abstract

Refuges offer prey animals protection from predation, but increased time spent hiding can reduce foraging opportunities. Within social groups, individuals vary in their refuge use and willingness to forage in the presence of a predator. Here, we examine the relative foraging benefits and mortality costs associated with individual refuge use and foraging behaviour within groups of goldfish (Carassius auratus) under predation risk from an avian predator (little egret-Egretta garzetta). We assessed individual order of emergence from the refuge and participation over 15 group foraging outings, and assigned each fish a daily outing index score. The individual fish that emerged from the refuge earlier than the other group members and that participated in more outings received high outing index scores and consumed more food compared with fish that tended to emerge in posterior positions and participate in fewer outings. However, individual fish that attained high outing index scores suffered a higher risk of predation. Furthermore, the amount of time the egret spent at the pool affected group foraging behaviour: as predation risk increased, groups of fish consumed significantly less food. Our results exemplify the trade-off between foraging success and safety from predation that prey species regularly experience.

摘要

避难所为被捕食动物提供了免受捕食的保护,但躲藏时间的增加会减少觅食机会。在社会群体中,个体在避难所的使用和在捕食者存在时觅食的意愿上存在差异。在这里,我们研究了在面临来自鸟类捕食者(小白鹭-Egretta garzetta)的捕食风险下,金鱼(Carassius auratus)群体中个体使用避难所和觅食行为的相对觅食收益和死亡率成本。我们评估了个体从避难所中出来的顺序以及在 15 次集体觅食外出中的参与度,并为每条鱼分配了每日外出指数得分。与倾向于处于后位并参与较少外出的鱼相比,那些比其他群体成员更早从避难所中出来并参与更多外出的个体获得了较高的外出指数得分并消耗了更多的食物。然而,获得高外出指数得分的个体鱼面临更高的捕食风险。此外,白鹭在水池停留的时间会影响群体的觅食行为:随着捕食风险的增加,鱼群消耗的食物明显减少。我们的研究结果体现了被捕食动物经常经历的觅食成功和免受捕食风险之间的权衡。

相似文献

1
Individual willingness to leave a safe refuge and the trade-off between food and safety: a test with social fish.个体离开安全避难所的意愿与食物和安全之间的权衡:用社会性鱼类进行的测试。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20190826. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0826. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
State-dependent foraging among social fish in a risky environment.在危险环境中群居鱼类的状态依赖型觅食行为
Oecologia. 2019 May;190(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04395-z. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
3
Optimal foraging of little egrets and their prey in a foraging game in a patchy environment.在斑块环境中的觅食游戏中,小白鹭及其猎物的最佳觅食策略。
Am Nat. 2013 Mar;181(3):381-95. doi: 10.1086/669156. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Social behaviour and foraging success of little egrets (Egretta garzetta).小白鹭(Egretta garzetta)的社会行为和觅食成功率。
Behav Processes. 2021 Feb;183:104318. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104318. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?同种个体的存在如何改变捕食者与猎物之间的行为博弈?
Oecologia. 2017 Jul;184(3):597-607. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3884-6. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Refuge quality impacts the strength of nonconsumptive effects on prey.避难所质量影响非消耗性作用对猎物的影响强度。
Ecology. 2017 Feb;98(2):403-411. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1647. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.是时候重新审视了?捕食者之前在猎物捕获方面的成功与失败决定了它返回斑块的时间。
Oecologia. 2019 Jun;190(2):387-397. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Binary patch assessment by goldfish under safe and dangerous conditions.金鱼在安全和危险条件下的二元斑块评估。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk.田鼠在鸟类捕食风险异质和鼬科动物捕食风险均匀情况下的觅食模式。
Oecologia. 2008 Oct;157(4):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1100-4. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
10
The cost of safety: refuges increase the impact of predation risk in aquatic systems.安全成本:避难所增加了水生系统中捕食风险的影响。
Ecology. 2013 Mar;94(3):573-9. doi: 10.1890/12-0502.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary origins of temporal discounting: Modeling how time and uncertainty constrain optimal decision-making strategies across taxa.时间折扣的进化起源:跨物种建模时间和不确定性如何约束最优决策策略。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0310658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310658. eCollection 2024.
2
Behavioral responses of a clonal fish to perceived predation risk.鱼类对感知到的捕食风险的行为反应。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 18;12:e17547. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17547. eCollection 2024.
3
Context-dependent multimodal behaviour in a coral reef fish.珊瑚礁鱼类中依赖环境的多模态行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 1;11(5):240151. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240151. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Atto-Foxes and Other Minutiae.阿托狐狸和其他琐事。
Bull Math Biol. 2021 Aug 31;83(10):104. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00936-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?边缘捕食:遭遇效应还是混淆效应能解释对猎物群体边缘的定向选择?
Behav Ecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;28(5):1283-1292. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx090. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish.一致的个体差异驱动着有组织鱼类的集体行为和群体功能。
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 25;27(18):2862-2868.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
High-predation habitats affect the social dynamics of collective exploration in a shoaling fish.高捕食栖息地影响了群体洄游鱼类的集体探索的社会动态。
Sci Adv. 2017 May 3;3(5):e1602682. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602682. eCollection 2017 May.
4
The relationship between foraging and shoal position in a mixed shoal of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus): a field study.拟鲤(Rutilus rutilus)和赤睛鱼(Leuciscus cephalus)混合鱼群中觅食与鱼群位置的关系:一项实地研究。
Oecologia. 1993 Mar;93(3):356-359. doi: 10.1007/BF00317878.
5
Small and large number discrimination in goldfish (Carassius auratus) with extensive training.经过广泛训练的金鱼(Carassius auratus)对数量多少的辨别
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 2):172-183. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Consensus and experience trump leadership, suppressing individual personality during social foraging.共识和经验胜过领导力,在社会觅食过程中压制个体个性。
Sci Adv. 2016 Sep 14;2(9):e1600892. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600892. eCollection 2016 Sep.
7
The cost of safety: refuges increase the impact of predation risk in aquatic systems.安全成本:避难所增加了水生系统中捕食风险的影响。
Ecology. 2013 Mar;94(3):573-9. doi: 10.1890/12-0502.1.
8
Optimal foraging of little egrets and their prey in a foraging game in a patchy environment.在斑块环境中的觅食游戏中,小白鹭及其猎物的最佳觅食策略。
Am Nat. 2013 Mar;181(3):381-95. doi: 10.1086/669156. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Generalized optimal risk allocation: foraging and antipredator behavior in a fluctuating environment.广义最优风险分配:波动环境中的觅食和反捕食行为。
Am Nat. 2012 Nov;180(5):589-603. doi: 10.1086/667885. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Consistency of leadership in shoals of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in novel and in familiar environments.在新环境和熟悉环境中,食蚊鱼( Gambusia holbrooki )群体中的领导一致性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036567. Epub 2012 May 8.