• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

较大的社区创造出更系统的语言。

Larger communities create more systematic languages.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Radboud University, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20191262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1262. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2019.1262
PMID:31311478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6661353/
Abstract

Understanding worldwide patterns of language diversity has long been a goal for evolutionary scientists, linguists and philosophers. Research over the past decade has suggested that linguistic diversity may result from differences in the social environments in which languages evolve. Specifically, recent work found that languages spoken in larger communities typically have more systematic grammatical structures. However, in the real world, community size is confounded with other social factors such as network structure and the number of second languages learners in the community, and it is often assumed that linguistic simplification is driven by these factors instead. Here, we show that in contrast to previous assumptions, community size has a unique and important influence on linguistic structure. We experimentally examine the live formation of new languages created in the laboratory by small and larger groups, and find that larger groups of interacting participants develop more systematic languages over time, and do so faster and more consistently than small groups. Small groups also vary more in their linguistic behaviours, suggesting that small communities are more vulnerable to drift. These results show that community size predicts patterns of language diversity, and suggest that an increase in community size might have contributed to language evolution.

摘要

长期以来,了解世界范围内语言多样性的模式一直是进化科学家、语言学家和哲学家的目标。过去十年的研究表明,语言多样性可能是由于语言进化的社会环境的差异造成的。具体来说,最近的研究发现,在更大的社区中使用的语言通常具有更系统的语法结构。然而,在现实世界中,社区规模与其他社会因素(如网络结构和社区中的第二语言学习者数量)混淆在一起,人们通常认为语言简化是由这些因素驱动的。在这里,我们表明,与之前的假设相反,社区规模对语言结构有着独特而重要的影响。我们通过实验组的方式,在实验室中对由小团体和大团体创造的新语言的实时形成进行了实验研究,结果发现,随着时间的推移,较大的互动参与者群体发展出了更系统的语言,而且速度更快、更一致,而较小的群体则变化更多。这表明小社区更容易受到漂移的影响。这些结果表明,社区规模可以预测语言多样性的模式,并表明社区规模的增加可能促成了语言的进化。

相似文献

1
Larger communities create more systematic languages.较大的社区创造出更系统的语言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20191262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1262. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability.什么样的语言更容易学?一项关于系统性结构和社群规模如何影响语言可学度的预先注册研究。
Cognition. 2021 May;210:104620. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104620. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
The Role of Social Network Structure in the Emergence of Linguistic Structure.社会网络结构在语言结构形成中的作用。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;44(8):e12876. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12876.
4
Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages.地理和社会隔离推动了南岛语系的演化。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243171. eCollection 2020.
5
Speaker Input Variability Does Not Explain Why Larger Populations Have Simpler Languages.说话者输入的变异性并不能解释为何更大的群体拥有更简单的语言。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0129463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129463. eCollection 2015.
6
Social scale and structural complexity in human languages.人类语言的社会规模和结构复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1829-36. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0216.
7
The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.语言共性的神话:语言多样性及其对认知科学的重要性。
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Oct;32(5):429-48; discussion 448-494. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X.
8
Social Network Limits Language Complexity.社交网络限制语言复杂性。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2790-2817. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12683. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
Small Traditional Human Communities Sustain Genomic Diversity over Microgeographic Scales despite Linguistic Isolation.尽管存在语言隔离,小型传统人类社区在微观地理尺度上仍维持着基因组多样性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Sep;33(9):2273-84. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw099. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
Handling Sign Language Data: The Impact of Modality.处理手语数据:模态的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00483. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Community Size and Iconicity in Sign Languages.手语中社群规模与象似性的关系
Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun;49(6):e70074. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70074.
2
Mechanisms of cultural diversity in urban populations.城市人口中文化多样性的机制。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 4;16(1):5192. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60538-2.
3
Deep neural networks and humans both benefit from compositional language structure.深度神经网络和人类都受益于组合式语言结构。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 30;15(1):10816. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55158-1.
4
Word reuse and combination support efficient communication of emerging concepts.词的重复使用和组合有助于高效传达新兴概念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 12;121(46):e2406971121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406971121. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Systematic mappings of sound to meaning: A theoretical review.声音到意义的系统映射:理论综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):627-648. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02395-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
A large quantitative analysis of written language challenges the idea that all languages are equally complex.一项针对书面语言的大规模定量分析对所有语言都同样复杂这一观点提出了挑战。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 16;13(1):15351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42327-3.
7
Societies of strangers do not speak less complex languages.陌生人社会的语言并不简单。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eadf7704. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf7704. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
8
Human major transitions from the perspective of distributed adaptations.从分布式适应的角度看人类的主要转变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 13;378(1872):20210401. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0401. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Biolinguistics: A Scientometric Analysis of Research on (Children's) Molecular Genetics of Speech and Language (Disorders).生物语言学:关于(儿童)言语和语言(障碍)分子遗传学研究的科学计量分析
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 27;9(9):1300. doi: 10.3390/children9091300.
10
Simultaneity as an Emergent Property of Efficient Communication in Language: A Comparison of Silent Gesture and Sign Language.同时性作为语言高效交际的突现属性:无声手势与手语的比较。
Cogn Sci. 2022 May;46(5):e13133. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13133.

本文引用的文献

1
Adult Learning and Language Simplification.成人学习与语言简化。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2818-2854. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12686. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
Compositional structure can emerge without generational transmission.组成结构可以在没有世代传递的情况下出现。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:151-164. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
Social Network Limits Language Complexity.社交网络限制语言复杂性。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2790-2817. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12683. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
The influence of social network size on speech perception.社交网络规模对言语感知的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2249-2260. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739865. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Simpler grammar, larger vocabulary: How population size affects language.语法更简单,词汇量更大:人口规模如何影响语言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2586.
6
Why Are There Different Languages? The Role of Adaptation in Linguistic Diversity.为什么会有不同的语言?适应在语言多样性中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;20(9):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
How the Size of Our Social Network Influences Our Semantic Skills.我们社交网络的规模如何影响我们的语义技能。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):2050-2064. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12317. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Speaker Input Variability Does Not Explain Why Larger Populations Have Simpler Languages.说话者输入的变异性并不能解释为何更大的群体拥有更简单的语言。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0129463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129463. eCollection 2015.
9
Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure.语言结构文化进化中的压缩与交流。
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots.气候、声带和声调语言:连接生理和地理的点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 3;112(5):1322-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417413112. Epub 2015 Jan 20.