Suppr超能文献

评估垂直跳跃过程中的力量-速度关系:起始位置、分析程序和负荷数量的影响。

Assessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loads.

机构信息

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, The Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.

University of Belgrade, Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Jun;20(5):614-623. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship parameters between the squat jumps performed from the 90° (SJ90) and self-preferred knee angle (SJ). A secondary aim was to explore the effect of the analysis procedure (force platform [FP] and Samozino's [SAM] method) and the number of loads tested (three- and two-point methods) on the F-V relationships. Twelve men were tested in two sessions during the SJ90 and SJ. Two identical blocks of jumps were performed in each session against three external loads. The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope and maximum power) were determined at each block through the FP and SAM procedures using the data collected under three (three-point method) or only the two most distant loads (two-point method). The average coefficient of variation (CV) of the four F-V parameters revealed a higher reliability for the SJ90 compared to the SJ (5.86% 7.55%; CV= 1.29) with more pronounced differences using the FP (CV= 1.43) than the SAM procedure (CV= 1.14), and higher reliability for the SAM compared to the FP (6.14% 7.27%; CV= 1.18). The SJ and SAM procedures provided comparable or higher magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters than the SJ90 and FP, respectively. The three- and two-point methods revealed a comparable reliability and trivial differences in the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters. The routine testing procedure of the F-V relationship could be simplified using the SJ, the SAM procedure and the two-point method.

摘要

本研究旨在比较从 90°深蹲跳(SJ90)和自感舒适的膝关节角度深蹲跳(SJ)中获得的力-速度(F-V)关系参数的可靠性和幅度。次要目的是探讨分析程序(力平台[FP]和 Samozino 方法[SAM])和测试负荷数量(三点和两点法)对 F-V 关系的影响。12 名男性在 SJ90 和 SJ 测试中进行了两次测试。在每个测试中,通过 FP 和 SAM 程序,使用在三个外部负荷下收集的数据,在两个相同的跳块中进行了两次相同的跳块测试。通过 FP 和 SAM 程序,在每个块中使用三点法(three-point method)或仅最远处的两个负载(two-point method)来确定 F-V 关系参数(最大力、最大速度、F-V 斜率和最大功率)。四个 F-V 参数的平均变异系数(CV)显示 SJ90 的可靠性高于 SJ(5.86% 7.55%;CV=1.29),FP 的 CV(1.43)比 SAM 程序(CV=1.14)的差异更明显,而 SAM 的可靠性高于 FP(6.14% 7.27%;CV=1.18)。SJ 和 SAM 程序提供的 F-V 关系参数的幅度与 SJ90 和 FP 相比,具有可比性或更高的幅度。三点和两点法在 F-V 关系参数的可靠性和幅度上具有可比性,差异很小。使用 SJ、SAM 程序和两点法,可以简化 F-V 关系的常规测试程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验