Suppr超能文献

Free-Cog:实用测试准确性研究及与 Mini-Addenbrooke 认知测验的比较。

Free-Cog: Pragmatic Test Accuracy Study and Comparison with Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination.

机构信息

Cognitive Function Clinic, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, United Kingdom,

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):254-263. doi: 10.1159/000500069. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Canonical definitions of the dementia construct encompass deficits in both cognition and function, but most screening instruments for possible dementia address only cognitive abilities. Free-Cog is a recently described brief screening instrument for dementia designed to address not only cognitive but also functional abilities.

METHODS

A pragmatic test accuracy study of Free-Cog was undertaken in consecutive patients seen over 1 year in a secondary care setting. The performance of Free-Cog for diagnosis of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was compared to that of Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (MACE).

RESULTS

In a cohort of 141 patients (prevalence of dementia and MCI 11 and 32%, respectively) both Free-Cog and MACE were quick and easy to use and acceptable to patients. Both tests had high sensitivity (1.00) and large effect sizes (Cohen's d) for diagnosis of dementia, but Free-Cog was more specific. For diagnosis of MCI, Free-Cog lacked sensitivity (0.58) but was specific (0.81), whereas MACE was sensitive (0.91) but not specific (0.35). Weighted comparison suggested equivalence for dementia diagnosis but a net benefit for MACE regarding MCI diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Free-Cog is an acceptable and accurate test for dementia screening in a dedicated cognitive disorders clinic, but it appears less sensitive than MACE for the identification of MCI.

摘要

背景/目的:痴呆症的经典定义包括认知和功能两方面的缺陷,但大多数用于筛查可能痴呆症的工具仅针对认知能力。Free-Cog 是一种新描述的用于痴呆症筛查的简短工具,旨在不仅评估认知能力,还评估功能能力。

方法

在一个二级保健环境中,对连续的患者进行了为期 1 年的 Free-Cog 的实用性测试准确性研究。Free-Cog 用于诊断痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的性能与 Mini-Addenbrooke 的认知测验(MACE)进行了比较。

结果

在 141 名患者的队列中(痴呆症和 MCI 的患病率分别为 11%和 32%),Free-Cog 和 MACE 都易于使用且患者易于接受。两种测试在诊断痴呆症方面均具有较高的敏感性(1.00)和较大的效应大小(Cohen's d),但 Free-Cog 的特异性更高。对于 MCI 的诊断,Free-Cog 的敏感性较低(0.58)但特异性较高(0.81),而 MACE 的敏感性较高(0.91)但特异性较低(0.35)。加权比较表明,对于痴呆症的诊断,两者等效,但对于 MCI 的诊断,MACE 具有净收益。

结论

Free-Cog 是专门的认知障碍诊所中用于痴呆症筛查的一种可接受且准确的测试,但它在识别 MCI 方面似乎不如 MACE 敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验