Early Jonathan, Arnott Elizabeth, Wilson Bethany, Wade Claire, McGreevy Paul
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 16;9(7):448. doi: 10.3390/ani9070448.
This study investigated the value that handlers and breeders assign to various behavioural traits in Australian livestock herding dogs. Data were obtained from 811 handlers and breeders through the 'Australian Farm Dog Survey'. Respondents were asked to consider dogs within four contexts: utility (livestock herding in both paddocks and yards), mustering (livestock herding in paddocks and along livestock routes), yards (in and around sheds, sale-yards and transport vehicles), and trial (specifically a standard 3-sheep trial), and to rate the value of 16 working manoeuvres (movement sequences used in herding), 11 working attributes (skills or attributes used in herding) and five general attributes (personality traits ascribed to an individual dog). The most valued working manoeuvres were , and . , and were considered of little value in certain contexts, notably the trial context. Across all four contexts, the general attributes most valued in dogs were being , , and , while and were the working attribute traits considered to be of most value. was revealed to be a 'Goldilocks' trait in that respondents preferred not too much or too little but a 'just right' amount in their preferred dog. Analysis indicated a handler preference for either specialised dogs for the utility context or dogs who are easy to work with because of a broad range of traits favoured in the yard context. These results reveal both generalities across and the need for specialisation within these four herding contexts. Further investigation may help to reveal how well handlers distinguish between innate and learnt behaviours when selecting and training livestock herding dogs. Identifying which group handlers fit into optimally may assist in selecting suitable dog-human dyads.
本研究调查了训犬员和繁育者对澳大利亚畜牧犬各种行为特征的重视程度。数据通过“澳大利亚农场犬调查”从811名训犬员和繁育者处获得。受访者被要求在四种情境下考虑犬只:实用情境(围场和场地中的畜牧工作)、赶拢情境(围场和畜牧路线上的畜牧工作)、场地情境(棚舍、销售场地和运输车辆内及周围)以及比赛情境(具体为标准的三羊比赛),并对16种工作动作(畜牧中使用的动作序列)、11种工作属性(畜牧中使用的技能或属性)和五种一般属性(赋予个体犬只的性格特征)进行评分。最受重视的工作动作是 、 和 。 、 和 在某些情境中,尤其是比赛情境中,被认为价值不大。在所有四种情境中,犬只最受重视的一般属性是 、 、 和 ,而 和 是被认为最有价值的工作属性特征。 被揭示为一种“恰到好处”的特征,因为受访者在他们喜欢的犬只中更喜欢不多不少、“恰到好处”的量。分析表明,训犬员要么偏爱实用情境下的专门犬只,要么偏爱因场地情境中受青睐的广泛特征而易于合作的犬只。这些结果揭示了这四种畜牧情境中的共性以及专业化的必要性。进一步的调查可能有助于揭示训犬员在挑选和训练畜牧犬时区分先天行为和后天习得行为的能力有多强。确定训犬员最适合哪一组可能有助于挑选合适的犬 - 人组合。