• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤缝合钉加防水伤口敷料与 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带在剖宫产术中闭合皮肤的临床和经济结局比较。

Clinical and economic outcomes of cesarean deliveries with skin closure through skin staples plus waterproof wound dressings versus 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape.

机构信息

Real World Data Analytics and Research, Medical Devices - Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun;34(11):1711-1720. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1645830. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1645830
PMID:31315503
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and economic outcomes of cesarean deliveries with skin closure through skin staples plus waterproof wound dressings (SSWWD) versus 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape (2OPMT). We hypothesized that cesarean deliveries with skin closure through 2OPMT may be associated with a lower rate of wound complications and infections as compared with skin closure through SSWWD; we also hypothesized that, accordingly, 2OPMT may be associated with lower hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and all-cause readmissions as compared with SSWWD.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study using a research database derived from administrative records routinely contributed by hundreds of hospitals in the USA. We queried the database for patients aged 18-49 years who had an in-hospital low transverse cesarean delivery between 1 January, 2012 and 31 March, 2017. Using records of medical supplies used during deliveries, we identified deliveries for which skin closure was performed by either SSWWD (SSWWD group) or 2OPMT (2OPMT group). Our primary study outcome was a composite endpoint of infection/wound complication diagnosis during the hospital stays in which the deliveries were performed. Our secondary outcomes included: length of stay (LOS) and total hospital costs for the hospital stays in which the deliveries were performed, and all-cause readmissions (30/60/90 days post discharge) to the same hospital in which the delivery was performed. We compared outcomes between propensity-score matched groups using regressions accounting for hospital-level clustering and non-Gaussian empirical outcome distributions.

RESULTS

Each group comprised 2133 patients (4266 total patients; mean age = 30.3 years [SD = 4.6]). Compared with the SSWWD group, the 2OPMT group had statistically significant lower rates of complications (infection, 0.7 versus 1.6%,  = .011; wound complication, 0.6 versus 1.3%,  = .036; composite, 0.9 versus 2.0%,  = .002), shorter LOS (mean = 3.5 days [SD = 1.6] versus 3.7 days [SD = 1.8],  = .007), and lower total hospital costs (mean = $8879 [SD = $3157] versus $9313 [SD = $3311],  = .025). Between-group differences for 30/60/90-day all-cause readmissions were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

This large observational study is the first of its kind and provides evidence that cesarean delivery skin closure with 2OPMT is associated with lower rates of in-hospital infection and wound complications, lower LOS, lower total hospital costs as compared with SSWWD.

摘要

目的

比较经皮钉合加防水伤口敷料(SSWWD)与 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带(2OPMT)缝合切口的剖宫产术的临床和经济结局。我们假设与 SSWWD 相比,2OPMT 缝合切口可能与较低的伤口并发症和感染发生率相关;我们还假设与 SSWWD 相比,2OPMT 可能与较低的住院时间(LOS)、住院费用和全因再入院率相关。

方法

使用源自美国数百家医院常规提供的行政记录的研究数据库进行回顾性观察性研究。我们从数据库中查询了年龄在 18-49 岁之间、2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间在医院行横切口剖宫产术的患者记录。使用分娩过程中使用的医疗用品记录,我们确定了使用 SSWWD(SSWWD 组)或 2OPMT(2OPMT 组)缝合切口的分娩。我们的主要研究结果是在分娩期间发生的感染/伤口并发症诊断的复合终点。我们的次要结果包括:分娩期间住院的 LOS 和总住院费用,以及在出院后 30/60/90 天到同一医院的全因再入院率。我们使用回归分析比较了倾向评分匹配组之间的结果,该分析考虑了医院水平的聚类和非正态经验结果分布。

结果

每组均包括 2133 名患者(4266 名患者;平均年龄为 30.3 岁[标准差=4.6])。与 SSWWD 组相比,2OPMT 组的并发症发生率较低(感染:0.7% vs. 1.6%, =.011;伤口并发症:0.6% vs. 1.3%, =.036;复合:0.9% vs. 2.0%, =.002),住院时间更短(平均=3.5 天[标准差=1.6] vs. 3.7 天[标准差=1.8], =.007),总住院费用更低(平均=8879 美元[标准差=3157 美元] vs. 9313 美元[标准差=3311 美元], =.025)。两组之间 30/60/90 天全因再入院率的差异无统计学意义。

结论

这项大型观察性研究是同类研究中的首例,提供了证据表明与 SSWWD 相比,使用 2OPMT 缝合剖宫产术的皮肤切口与较低的院内感染和伤口并发症发生率、较短的住院时间、较低的总住院费用相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical and economic outcomes of cesarean deliveries with skin closure through skin staples plus waterproof wound dressings versus 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape.皮肤缝合钉加防水伤口敷料与 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带在剖宫产术中闭合皮肤的临床和经济结局比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun;34(11):1711-1720. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1645830. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Economic and clinical outcomes of spinal fusion surgeries with skin closure through skin staples plus waterproof wound dressings versus 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape.皮肤钉合加防水伤口敷料与 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带闭合在脊柱融合手术中的经济和临床结果比较。
Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
3
Clinical and economic outcomes after sternotomy for cardiac surgery with skin closure through 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape versus absorbable sutures plus waterproof wound dressings: a retrospective cohort study.心脏手术胸骨切开术后采用 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带与可吸收缝线加防水伤口敷料进行皮肤闭合的临床和经济结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 28;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01956-x.
4
Economic and clinical comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate/polymer mesh tape with skin staples in total knee replacement.全膝关节置换术中2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯/聚合物网状胶带与皮肤钉合器的经济与临床比较
J Wound Care. 2018 Apr 1;27(Sup4):S12-S22. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup4.S12.
5
Patient outcomes associated with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesive in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.与 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯局部皮肤粘合剂在冠状动脉旁路移植术中相关的患者结局。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;12(4):307-16. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.062.
6
Skin closure with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polyester mesh after primary total knee arthroplasty offers superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared to staples: a prospective trial.初次全膝关节置换术后使用 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和聚酯网进行皮肤缝合,与使用订书钉相比,可获得更好的美容效果和患者满意度:一项前瞻性试验。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):447-453. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02591-4. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: a comparative study between 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate and staples for wound closure.脊柱手术中的手术部位感染:2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯与吻合钉用于伤口闭合的比较研究
Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):854-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3202-5. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.体质量指数为 40 或更高的剖宫产切口缝合与订书钉缝合的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan;3(1):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100271. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?剖宫产术后伤口并发症发生时间是否因皮肤缝合类型而异?
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;36(9):981-984. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675767. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
10
Use of interrupted time-series analyses in evaluating health economic outcomes following implementation of multilayer water-tight wound closure in a primary total joint arthroplasty population.在初级全关节置换人群中实施多层水密性伤口闭合后,利用中断时间序列分析评估健康经济结果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Apr;13(4):e230110. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0110. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Barbed Sutures and Self-Adhering Mesh System and Polymeric Glue for Wound Closure in Multilevel or Revision Spinal Surgery: A Matched Cohort Comparative Study With Conventional Wound Closure Procedure.在多节段或翻修脊柱手术中使用倒刺缝线、自粘网片系统和聚合胶水进行伤口闭合的手术及临床结果:一项与传统伤口闭合程序的匹配队列对比研究。
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):981-988. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346534.267. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
2
Clinical and economic outcomes after sternotomy for cardiac surgery with skin closure through 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape versus absorbable sutures plus waterproof wound dressings: a retrospective cohort study.心脏手术胸骨切开术后采用 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯加聚合物网带与可吸收缝线加防水伤口敷料进行皮肤闭合的临床和经济结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 28;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01956-x.