Vollertsen R S, Nobrega F T, Michet C J, Hanson T J, Naessens J M
Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Mayo Clin Proc. 1988 Jun;63(6):583-91. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)64888-5.
We investigated the effects of prospectively identified factors on the duration of hospital stay and part A charges in 240 hospitalizations (of 230 patients) for the diagnosis-related group "medical back problems" (DRG 243) at a tertiary-care institution in 1985 to determine whether heterogeneity existed within this reimbursement category. We confirmed our initial postulates that nonosteoporotic fractures and neck problems, as well as hospitalizations primarily for myelography after outpatient neurologic evaluation, had considerably different economic outcomes and thus excluded these categories from further analysis. Statistical analysis (forward stepwise regression) of the remaining 132 patients who had "general medical back problems" showed that increasing age, associated osteoporosis, and therapeutic injections best explained variation in the natural logarithm of duration of stay (R2 = 0.16). Total number of diagnoses, spondylosis, associated osteoporosis, age, therapeutic injections, and performance of special procedures best explained the variation in the logarithm of part A charges (R2 = 0.29). The ability to identify factors within a specified category that affect the duration of hospitalization and part A charges jeopardizes the fairness of prospective payment, and we believe that DRG 243 should be adjusted for age, comorbidity, and readily identifiable clinical syndromes that have disparate economic consequences. Because of poorly substantiated efficacy and a significant association with longer hospital stays and higher part A charges, clinicians should review the use of therapeutic injections for medical back problems. Analysis of case-mix such as ours should be helpful in promoting efficient practice and ensuring the fairness of any reimbursement system.
1985年,我们在一家三级医疗机构,对240例(涉及230名患者)诊断相关组“背部医疗问题”(DRG 243)住院病例中预先确定的因素对住院时间和A部分费用的影响进行了调查,以确定该报销类别中是否存在异质性。我们证实了最初的假设,即非骨质疏松性骨折和颈部问题,以及门诊神经学评估后主要因脊髓造影而住院的病例,其经济结果有很大差异,因此在进一步分析中排除了这些类别。对其余132例患有“一般性背部医疗问题”患者的统计分析(向前逐步回归)表明,年龄增长、合并骨质疏松症和治疗性注射最能解释住院时间自然对数的变化(R2 = 0.16)。诊断总数、脊椎关节强硬、合并骨质疏松症、年龄、治疗性注射以及特殊程序的实施最能解释A部分费用对数的变化(R2 = 0.29)。识别特定类别中影响住院时间和A部分费用的因素的能力危及了预期支付的公平性,我们认为DRG 243应根据年龄、合并症以及具有不同经济后果的易于识别的临床综合征进行调整。由于治疗性注射的疗效证据不足,且与较长住院时间和较高A部分费用有显著关联,临床医生应重新审视治疗性注射在背部医疗问题中的使用。像我们这样的病例组合分析应有助于促进高效医疗实践,并确保任何报销系统的公平性。