• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部1.5T磁共振成像后的听力阈值变化

Hearing Thresholds Changes after MRI 1.5T of Head and Neck.

作者信息

Bahaloo Maryam, Davari Mohammad Hossein, Sobhan Mohammad, Mirmohammadi Seyyed Jalil, Jalalian Mohammad Taghi, Zare Sakhvidi Mohammad Javad, Shamsi Farimah, Mirfendereski Sam, Mollasadeghi Abolfazl, Mehrparvar Amir Houshang

机构信息

Industrial Diseases Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89138-14389, Iran.

Department of Radiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89138-14389, Iran.

出版信息

Radiol Res Pract. 2019 Jun 17;2019:8756579. doi: 10.1155/2019/8756579. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/8756579
PMID:31316833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6601493/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to high intensity noise produced by MRI is a cause for concern. This study was conducted to determine the temporary and permanent effects of exposure to noise created by performing MRI on the hearing threshold of the subjects using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry.

METHODS

This semiexperimental study was performed on 35 patients referred to Shahid Rahnemoun Hospital for head and neck MRI due to different clinical conditions. The hearing threshold of patients was measured before, immediately after, and 24 hours after performing 1.5 Tesla MRI using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry. SPSS version 18 was used to compare the mean hearing thresholds before and after MRI using paired T test and repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

Comparison of auditory thresholds in conventional and extended high frequencies before and immediately after MRI showed a significant shift at 4 KHz (P = 0.008 and P = 0.08 for right and left ears), 6 KHz (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01 for right and left ears), and 14 KHz (P =0.03 and P = 0.31 for right and left ears). However, there was no significant difference between audiometric thresholds before and 24 hours after MRI.

CONCLUSION

Noise due to 1.5 Tesla MRI can only cause transient threshold shift.

摘要

引言

暴露于磁共振成像(MRI)产生的高强度噪声令人担忧。本研究旨在使用传统和扩展高频听力测定法,确定进行MRI时产生的噪声暴露对受试者听力阈值的暂时和永久影响。

方法

本半实验性研究对35例因不同临床情况转诊至沙希德拉赫内蒙医院进行头颈部MRI检查的患者进行。在使用1.5特斯拉MRI检查前、检查后立即以及检查后24小时,使用传统和扩展高频听力测定法测量患者的听力阈值。使用SPSS 18版软件,通过配对t检验和重复测量分析比较MRI检查前后的平均听力阈值。

结果

MRI检查前后传统和扩展高频的听阈比较显示,在4千赫兹(右耳P = 0.008,左耳P = 0.08)、6千赫兹(右耳P = 0.03,左耳P = 0.01)和14千赫兹(右耳P = 0.03,左耳P = 0.31)处有显著变化。然而,MRI检查前和检查后24小时的听力测定阈值之间没有显著差异。

结论

1.5特斯拉MRI产生的噪声只会导致暂时阈移。

相似文献

1
Hearing Thresholds Changes after MRI 1.5T of Head and Neck.头颈部1.5T磁共振成像后的听力阈值变化
Radiol Res Pract. 2019 Jun 17;2019:8756579. doi: 10.1155/2019/8756579. eCollection 2019.
2
Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.扩展高频智能手机听力测定法:有效性与可靠性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):217-226. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17111. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency.3特斯拉磁共振成像在标准头颈部序列中的噪声不会导致高频暂时性阈移。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3109-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3232-y. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
4
[Effects of occupational noise exposure on asymmetric hearing loss in automobile manufacturing workers].[职业噪声暴露对汽车制造工人不对称性听力损失的影响]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 20;37(4):260-264. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2019.04.004.
5
Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.儿童分泌性中耳炎:纯音听阈测试中的跨频相关。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221405. eCollection 2019.
6
Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.使用纯音和窄带噪声刺激获得的传统和扩展高频听力阈值的等效性和重测再现性。
Int J Audiol. 2017 Sep;56(9):635-642. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1309084. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Evaluation of the possible effect of magnetic resonance imaging noise on peripheral hearing organ with the otoacoustic emission.利用耳声发射评估磁共振成像噪声对周围听觉器官可能产生的影响。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102586. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102586. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Hearing loss in relation to sound exposure of professional symphony orchestra musicians.职业交响乐团音乐家的听力损失与声音暴露的关系。
Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):448-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000029.
9
Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.一组纯音听力阈值正常的职业歌手的瞬态诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.
10
Postoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Association to Audiometric Thresholds and Auditory Performance.儿童人工耳蜗植入术后耳蜗内电描记术:与听阈和听觉表现的相关性。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1135-1143. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000833.

引用本文的文献

1
The State of High-Resolution Imaging of the Human Inner Ear: A Look Into the Black Box.人类内耳的高分辨率成像现状:窥探黑匣子
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jul;12(28):e00556. doi: 10.1002/advs.202500556. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Does 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have Adverse Effect on Cochlear Functions?3 特斯拉磁共振成像对耳蜗功能有不良影响吗?
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 Sep;17(5):412-416. doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.21091.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporary Hearing Threshold Shift in Healthy Volunteers with Hearing Protection Caused by Acoustic Noise Exposure during 3-T Multisequence MR Neuroimaging.健康志愿者在 3T 多序列磁共振神经成像期间因声学噪声暴露导致的听力保护下的临时听阈偏移。
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):602-608. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161622. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency.3特斯拉磁共振成像在标准头颈部序列中的噪声不会导致高频暂时性阈移。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3109-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3232-y. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
3
Conventional Audiometry, Extended High-Frequency Audiometry, and DPOAE for Early Diagnosis of NIHL.传统听力测定法、扩展高频听力测定法及畸变产物耳声发射用于噪声性听力损失的早期诊断
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e9628. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.9628. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
4
Sensorineural hearing loss after magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像后的感音神经性听力损失
Case Rep Radiol. 2013;2013:510258. doi: 10.1155/2013/510258. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
5
Amplitude changes in otoacoustic emissions after exposure to industrial noise.暴露于工业噪声后耳声发射的幅度变化。
Noise Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;14(56):28-31. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.93329.
6
High-frequency audiometry: a means for early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss.高频听力测定法:一种早期诊断噪声性听力损失的方法。
Noise Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;13(55):402-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.90295.
7
Hearing loss after noise exposure.噪声暴露后的听力损失。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011 Aug;38(4):519-22. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Extended high-frequency audiometry and noise induced hearing loss in cement workers.水泥工人的扩展高频听力测定与噪声性听力损失
Am J Ind Med. 2008 Jun;51(6):452-62. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20580.
9
Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.3特斯拉磁共振成像扫描仪声学噪声的测量与评估
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2007 Jan;69(1-2):23-8.
10
The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.职业性噪声性听力损失的全球负担。
Am J Ind Med. 2005 Dec;48(6):446-58. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20223.