Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Center for Healthy Ageing, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Dec;24(12):1963-1967. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1642296. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
To explore the association between cognitive deficits and health-related quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
The revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R for physical impairment), the ALS Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-40 for health-related quality of life) and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS for cognition) were assessed in 125 patients with ALS. Correlations between ALSAQ-40 domains and ECAS functions were tested using Spearman correlation. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between dysphagia, depression, hopelessness, pain (all derived from corresponding items from the ALSFRS-R or ALSAQ-40), ALSFRS-R, ECAS and the ALSAQ-40.
Verbal fluency, language and executive function were disturbed in 69 (55%), 54 (43%) and 41 (33%) patients, respectively. In the ALS non-specific domains the memory and visuospatial function were impaired in 44 (35%) and 12 (10%) patients. In the non-demented group the five ECAS functions did not correlate with the ALSAQ-40 subdomains. The ALSFRS-R score, hopelessness, pain, and depression explained 65% of the ALSAQ-40 SI variance; the ECAS total score did not significantly predict ALSAQ-40 summary index. The ECAS visuospatial, executive function and fluency significantly predicted emotional well-being (adjusted = 0.08). When the model was controlled for depression, hopelessness and pain none of the ECAS functions (visuospatial, executive function and fluency) were significant predictors of emotional well-being.
Deficits in visuospatial function, executive function and fluency constrain the ability to manage activities of daily living and this might cause decline in well-being.
探讨肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者认知障碍与健康相关生活质量之间的关系。
对 125 例 ALS 患者进行修订后的肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R 评估躯体功能障碍)、肌萎缩侧索硬化评估问卷(ALSAQ-40 评估健康相关生活质量)和爱丁堡认知与行为 ALS 筛查(ECAS 评估认知)。采用 Spearman 相关分析评估 ALSAQ-40 各领域与 ECAS 各功能之间的相关性。采用线性回归评估吞咽困难、抑郁、绝望、疼痛(均源自 ALSFRS-R 或 ALSAQ-40 中的相应条目)、ALSFRS-R、ECAS 与 ALSAQ-40 之间的关系。
分别有 69(55%)例、54(43%)例和 41(33%)例患者存在言语流畅性、语言和执行功能障碍。在 ALS 非特异性领域,44(35%)例和 12(10%)例患者存在记忆和视空间功能障碍。在非痴呆组,ECAS 5 项功能与 ALSAQ-40 亚领域均无相关性。ALSFRS-R 评分、绝望、疼痛和抑郁解释了 ALSAQ-40 SI 方差的 65%;ECAS 总分对 ALSAQ-40 综合指数无显著预测作用。ECAS 视空间、执行功能和流畅性显著预测情绪健康(调整后 = 0.08)。当模型控制抑郁、绝望和疼痛时,ECAS 无任何功能(视空间、执行功能和流畅性)对情绪健康有显著预测作用。
视空间功能、执行功能和流畅性障碍限制了日常生活活动的管理能力,从而可能导致幸福感下降。