Aiello Edoardo Nicolò, Solca Federica, Torre Silvia, Patisso Valerio, De Lorenzo Alberto, Treddenti Mauro, Colombo Eleonora, Maranzano Alessio, Morelli Claudia, Doretti Alberto, Verde Federico, Silani Vincenzo, Ticozzi Nicola, Poletti Barbara
Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Neurology Residency Program, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jul 20;15:1217080. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1217080. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed at clarifying the role of bulbar involvement (BI) as a risk factor for cognitive impairment (CI) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients.
Data on = 347 patients were retrospectively collected. Cognition was assessed via the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). On the basis of clinical records and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores, BI was characterized as follows: (1) BI at onset-from medical history; (2) BI at testing (an ALSFRS-R-Bulbar score ≤11); (3) dysarthria (a score ≤3 on item 1 of the ALSFRS-R); (4) severity of BI (the total score on the ALSFRS-R-Bulbar); and (5) progression rate of BI (computed as 12-ALSFRS-R-Bulbar/disease duration in months). Logistic regressions were run to predict a below- vs. above-cutoff performance on each ECAS measure based on BI-related features while accounting for sex, disease duration, severity and progression rate of respiratory and spinal involvement and ECAS response modality.
No predictors yielded significance either on the ECAS-Total and -ALS-non-specific or on ECAS-Language/-Fluency or -Visuospatial subscales. BI at testing predicted a higher probability of an abnormal performance on the ECAS-ALS-specific ( = 0.035) and ECAS-Executive Functioning ( = 0.018). Lower ALSFRS-R-Bulbar scores were associated with a defective performance on the ECAS-Memory ( = 0.025). No other BI-related features affected other ECAS performances.
In ALS, the occurrence of BI itself, while neither its specific features nor its presence at onset, might selectively represent a risk factor for executive impairment, whilst its severity might be associated with memory deficits.
本研究旨在阐明延髓受累(BI)作为非痴呆型肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者认知障碍(CI)风险因素的作用。
回顾性收集了347例患者的数据。通过爱丁堡认知与行为ALS筛查(ECAS)评估认知功能。根据临床记录和ALS功能评定量表修订版(ALSFRS-R)评分,BI的特征如下:(1)起病时的BI——根据病史;(2)检查时的BI(ALSFRS-R延髓评分≤11);(3)构音障碍(ALSFRS-R第1项评分≤3);(4)BI的严重程度(ALSFRS-R延髓总分);(5)BI的进展率(计算方法为12-ALSFRS-R延髓评分/疾病持续时间,以月为单位)。进行逻辑回归分析,以基于与BI相关的特征预测每项ECAS测量中低于或高于临界值的表现,同时考虑性别、疾病持续时间、呼吸和脊髓受累的严重程度和进展率以及ECAS反应方式。
在ECAS总分、ECAS-ALS非特异性量表、ECAS语言/流畅性量表或ECAS视觉空间亚量表上,没有预测因素具有显著性。检查时的BI预测ECAS-ALS特异性量表(P=0.035)和ECAS执行功能量表(P=0.018)表现异常的可能性更高。较低的ALSFRS-R延髓评分与ECAS记忆量表表现缺陷相关(P=0.025)。没有其他与BI相关的特征影响其他ECAS表现。
在ALS中,BI的出现本身,而不是其具体特征或起病时是否存在,可能选择性地代表执行功能障碍的风险因素,而其严重程度可能与记忆缺陷有关。