• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热消融(射频和激光)的安全性和有效性:我们是否应该治疗所有类型的甲状腺结节?

Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation (radiofrequency and laser): should we treat all types of thyroid nodules? .

机构信息

a Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism , CHU Lille , Lille , France.

b American Hospital of Paris, Thyroid Unit , Neuilly-sur-Seine , France.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):666-676. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1627432.

DOI:10.1080/02656736.2019.1627432
PMID:31317800
Abstract

Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive technique that is gradually acknowledged as an effective alternative to surgery to treat thyroid nodules. Two main techniques have been described: radiofrequency (RFA) and laser ablation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two main techniques (RFA and laser ablation) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. This bicentric retrospective study included 166 consecutive patients, who received clinical, biological and ultrasound evaluations for thyroid nodules, from October 2013 to November 2017. One of the two techniques was proposed if a nodule was proven to be benign after fine needle aspiration cytology or micro-biopsy. Adverse events and outcomes (symptoms, nodule reduction) were assessed at 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. One hundred and eighty-nine nodules (mean size 17.5 ± 16.9 mL, 86.1% palpable) were treated by RFA (n = 108 (57.1%)) or laser ablation ( = 81 (42.9%)) in 166 patients (80.1% women, mean age 51.7 years). Two cases of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, one hematoma, and two successfully drained abscesses (5/166 = 3%) were observed. Clinical symptoms improved significantly in the two groups (anterior cervical discomfort -83.6%, esthetic complaints -84.9% and dysphagia -86.4%). Nodule volume (mL) decreased significantly (baseline 18 months) from 20.4 ± 18.6 to 5.8 ± 6.6 (-75%) in the RFA, and from 13.6 ± 13.3 to 3.4 ± 4.1 (-83.9%) in the laser ablation groups. Transient but potentially serious adverse events were reported in 3% of patients. A significant volumetric reduction was achieved with both techniques, regardless of nodule's characteristics, at 18 months.

摘要

热消融是一种微创技术,已逐渐被公认为治疗甲状腺结节的有效手术替代方法。有两种主要技术已被描述:射频(RFA)和激光消融。

为了评估两种主要技术(RFA 和激光消融)治疗良性甲状腺结节的安全性和有效性。这项双中心回顾性研究纳入了 2013 年 10 月至 2017 年 11 月期间接受甲状腺结节临床、生物学和超声评估的 166 例连续患者。如果细针穿刺细胞学或微活检证实结节为良性,则提出其中一种技术进行治疗。在治疗后 6 周和 6、12 和 18 个月评估不良事件和结局(症状、结节缩小)。在 166 例患者中(80.1%为女性,平均年龄 51.7 岁),189 个结节(平均大小 17.5±16.9ml,86.1%可触及)接受了 RFA(n=108[57.1%])或激光消融(n=81[42.9%])治疗。观察到 2 例暂时性喉返神经麻痹、1 例血肿和 2 例成功引流脓肿(5/166=3%)。两组临床症状均明显改善(颈前不适-83.6%,美容投诉-84.9%和吞咽困难-86.4%)。结节体积(ml)明显减少(基线 18 个月),RFA 组从 20.4±18.6 降至 5.8±6.6(-75%),激光消融组从 13.6±13.3 降至 3.4±4.1(-83.9%)。报告了 3%的患者发生短暂但潜在严重的不良事件。无论结节特征如何,两种技术在 18 个月时均可实现显著的体积减少。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation (radiofrequency and laser): should we treat all types of thyroid nodules? .热消融(射频和激光)的安全性和有效性:我们是否应该治疗所有类型的甲状腺结节?
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):666-676. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1627432.
2
Laser Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Non-Functioning Thyroid Nodules: Six-Month Results of a Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label, Trial (LARA Trial).激光消融与射频消融治疗良性非功能性甲状腺结节:一项随机、平行、开放标签临床试验(LARA 试验)的 6 个月结果。
Thyroid. 2020 Jun;30(6):847-856. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0660. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
A comparison of laser with radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score matching analysis.激光与射频消融治疗良性甲状腺结节的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2017 Dec;33(8):911-919. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1332395. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Solid benign thyroid nodules (>10 ml): a retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of sonographically guided ethanol ablation combined with radiofrequency ablation.实性良性甲状腺结节 (>10ml):超声引导下乙醇消融联合射频消融的疗效和安全性的回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):157-167. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1717647.
5
Single-session treatment of benign thyroid nodules with radiofrequency ablation: Results at 6 months in 24 patients.射频消融治疗良性甲状腺结节:24 例患者 6 个月的结果。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;67(3):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Minimally Invasive Treatments of Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Network Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.微创治疗良性甲状腺结节:短期结局的网状 Meta 分析。
Thyroid. 2023 Aug;33(8):950-964. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0671. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
7
Comparison of the Efficiency of Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Methods in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules.射频与微波消融方法治疗良性甲状腺结节的疗效比较。
Acad Radiol. 2023 Oct;30(10):2172-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.030. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
8
Comparison of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation, laser ablation, and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of elderly patients with benign thyroid nodules: A meta-analysis.超声引导下微波消融、激光消融与射频消融治疗老年良性甲状腺结节的疗效比较:Meta 分析。
Exp Gerontol. 2024 Jun 15;191:112425. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112425. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
9
Prospective study of effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus control group in patients affected by benign thyroid nodules.超声引导下射频消融术与对照组治疗良性甲状腺结节患者有效性的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):460-6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2186. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Five-Year Results of Radiofrequency and Laser Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Study from the Italian Minimally Invasive Treatments of the Thyroid Group.良性甲状腺结节射频和激光消融的 5 年结果:来自意大利微创甲状腺治疗组的多中心研究。
Thyroid. 2020 Dec;30(12):1759-1770. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0202. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications after thermal ablation for thyroid nodules across countries.各国甲状腺结节热消融术后的并发症
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 29;16:1608164. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1608164. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.射频消融治疗继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2024 Dec 16;18(6):287-296. doi: 10.2478/abm-2024-0036. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Effect of ultrasound parameters of benign thyroid nodules on radiofrequency ablation efficacy.
良性甲状腺结节超声参数对射频消融疗效的影响。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01044-z.
4
Temperature-controlled laser thermal therapy system using a newly developed laparoscopic system equipped with an ultra-compact thermographic camera.采用新型腹腔镜系统和超小型热成像摄像机的控温激光热疗系统。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22908-4.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation for Treating Lymph Node Metastasis From Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.热消融治疗甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 1;12:738299. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.738299. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Thermal Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules: The Issue of Regrowth.良性甲状腺结节热消融的长期结果:再生长问题
Int J Endocrinol. 2021 Jul 21;2021:9922509. doi: 10.1155/2021/9922509. eCollection 2021.
7
Prevalence and characteristics of vagus nerve variations on neck ultrasonography.颈部超声检查中迷走神经变异的发生率及特征
Ultrasonography. 2022 Jan;41(1):124-130. doi: 10.14366/usg.21045. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
8
Update of Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules. The Future Is Now.射频消融治疗甲状腺良恶性结节的更新。未来已来。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;12:698689. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.698689. eCollection 2021.
9
Long-Term Results of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: State of the Art and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.超声引导下射频消融良性甲状腺结节的长期疗效:现状与未来展望——系统综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 26;12:622996. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.622996. eCollection 2021.
10
Horner's Syndrome During High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for a Benign Thyroid Nodule.高强度聚焦超声消融治疗良性甲状腺结节时出现霍纳综合征
AACE Clin Case Rep. 2021 Jan 7;7(3):164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.aace.2020.11.035. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.