Suppr超能文献

手术与非手术治疗 2 部分肱骨近端骨折:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedics, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 18;16(7):e1002855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002855. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although increasingly used, the benefit of surgical treatment of displaced 2-part proximal humerus fractures has not been proven. This trial evaluates the clinical effectiveness of surgery with locking plate compared with non-operative treatment for these fractures.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The NITEP group conducted a superiority, assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized trial in 6 hospitals in Finland, Estonia, Sweden, and Denmark. Eighty-eight patients aged 60 years or older with displaced (more than 1 cm or 45 degrees) 2-part surgical or anatomical neck proximal humerus fracture were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either operative treatment with a locking plate or non-operative treatment. The mean age of patients was 72 years in the non-operative group and 73 years in the operative group, with a female sex distribution of 95% and 87%, respectively. Patients were recruited between February 2011 and April 2016. The primary outcome measure was Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included Constant-Murley score, the visual analogue scale for pain, the quality of life questionnaire 15D, EuroQol Group's 5-dimension self-reported questionnaire EQ-5D, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and complications. The mean DASH score (0 best, 100 worst) at 2 years was 18.5 points for the operative treatment group and 17.4 points for the non-operative group (mean difference 1.1 [95% CI -7.8 to 9.4], p = 0.81). At 2 years, there were no statistically or clinically significant between-group differences in any of the outcome measures. All 3 complications resulting in secondary surgery occurred in the operative group. The lack of blinding in patient-reported outcome assessment is a limitation of the study. Our assessor physiotherapists were, however, blinded.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial found no significant difference in clinical outcomes at 2 years between surgery and non-operative treatment in patients 60 years of age or older with displaced 2-part fractures of the proximal humerus. These results suggest that the current practice of performing surgery on the majority of displaced proximal 2-part fractures of the humerus in older adults may not be beneficial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246167.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多地应用,但手术治疗移位的 2 部分肱骨近端骨折的益处尚未得到证实。本试验评估了锁定钢板手术与非手术治疗这些骨折的临床效果。

方法和发现

NITEP 组在芬兰、爱沙尼亚、瑞典和丹麦的 6 家医院进行了一项优势、评估者盲法、多中心随机试验。88 名年龄在 60 岁或以上、有移位(超过 1 厘米或 45 度)的 2 部分外科或解剖颈肱骨近端骨折的患者,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受锁定钢板手术或非手术治疗。非手术组患者的平均年龄为 72 岁,手术组为 73 岁,女性分别占 95%和 87%。患者于 2011 年 2 月至 2016 年 4 月间招募。主要结局测量指标为 2 年随访时的上肢功能障碍(DASH)评分。次要结局包括 Constant-Murley 评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分、生活质量问卷 15D、欧洲五维健康量表自我报告问卷 EQ-5D、牛津肩肘评分和并发症。手术组的平均 DASH 评分(0 分最佳,100 分最差)为 18.5 分,非手术组为 17.4 分(平均差值 1.1[95%CI-7.8 至 9.4],p=0.81)。在 2 年时,在任何结局测量指标中,两组之间均无统计学或临床显著差异。所有 3 例导致二次手术的并发症均发生在手术组。患者报告结局评估的缺乏盲法是该研究的一个局限性。然而,我们的评估物理治疗师是盲法的。

结论

本试验发现,在 60 岁及以上的肱骨近端 2 部分移位骨折患者中,与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗在 2 年时的临床结局无显著差异。这些结果表明,目前对大多数老年移位的肱骨近端 2 部分骨折进行手术治疗可能没有益处。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246167。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d408/6638737/2c6dae708450/pmed.1002855.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验