Budharaju Ashrita, Hones Keegan M, Hao Kevin A, Wright Jonathan O, Fedorka Catherine J, Kaar Scott G, Bohsali Kamal I, Wright Thomas W, Patrick Matthew R, King Joseph J
College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul;16(4):449-458. doi: 10.1177/17585732231182374. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are relatively common, although optimal rehabilitation is unknown. This review aims to characterize the published rehabilitation regimens utilized for PHFs.
A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines, utilizing PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. All studies reporting PHF rehabilitation protocols after nonoperative management, open reduction internal fixation with a plate, or intramedullary nailing were included.
Forty articles comprising 3507 patients (66% female, weighted mean age 63.5 years) were included. Substantial variability was present regardless of management. Rehabilitation modalities reported were: sling use in 34 cohorts, most commonly for three weeks; pendulum exercises in 21 cohorts, most commonly starting at post-intervention day 1; post-intervention passive range of motion (ROM) for 30 cohorts, most commonly starting at two days; active-ROM in eight cohorts, most commonly starting at three weeks; active-assisted ROM for 21 cohorts, most commonly starting at three weeks; unlimited ROM for 20 cohorts, most commonly at 4 or 6 weeks; non-weight-bearing for six cohorts, most commonly for six weeks; strengthening for 16 cohorts, most commonly at six weeks; removal of all restrictions for nine cohorts, most commonly starting at six weeks.
Published rehabilitation protocols for PHFs vary considerably regardless of management. Future studies comparing methods of management need to consider the influence of postoperative rehabilitation protocol heterogeneity when aggregating data from multiple sites.
IV.
肱骨近端骨折(PHF)相对常见,但其最佳康复方案尚不清楚。本综述旨在描述已发表的用于PHF的康复方案。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述,使用PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库。纳入所有报告非手术治疗、钢板切开复位内固定或髓内钉固定后PHF康复方案的研究。
纳入40篇文章,共3507例患者(66%为女性,加权平均年龄63.5岁)。无论治疗方式如何,均存在很大差异。报告的康复方式包括:34个队列使用吊带,最常见的是使用三周;21个队列进行钟摆运动,最常见的是在干预后第1天开始;30个队列进行干预后被动活动范围(ROM)训练,最常见的是在两天后开始;8个队列进行主动ROM训练,最常见的是在三周后开始;21个队列进行主动辅助ROM训练,最常见的是在三周后开始;20个队列进行无限制ROM训练,最常见的是在4或6周;6个队列进行非负重训练,最常见的是六周;16个队列进行强化训练,最常见的是在六周;9个队列去除所有限制,最常见的是在六周后开始。
无论治疗方式如何,已发表的PHF康复方案差异很大。未来比较治疗方法的研究在汇总多个研究地点的数据时,需要考虑术后康复方案异质性的影响。
IV级