Suppr超能文献

手术治疗与锁定钢板或人工半肩关节置换术与非手术治疗老年患者 3-4 部分肱骨近端骨折(NITEP):一项开放性随机试验。

Surgery with locking plate or hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of 3-4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients (NITEP): An open-label randomized trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 28;20(11):e1004308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004308. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common fractures, especially in older female patients. These fractures are commonly treated surgically, but the consensus on the best treatment is still lacking.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The primary aim of this multicenter, randomized 3-arm superiority, open-label trial was to assess the results of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment either with locking plate (LP) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) of 3- and 4-part PHF with the primary outcome of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) at 2-year follow-up. Between February 2011 and December 2019, 160 patients 60 years and older with 3- and 4-part PHFs were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 fashion in block size of 10 to undergo nonoperative treatment (control) or operative intervention with LP or HA. In total, 54 patients were assigned to the nonoperative group, 52 to the LP group, and 54 to the HA group. Five patients assigned to the LP group were reassigned to the HA group perioperatively due to high comminution, and all of these patients had 4-part fractures. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were 42 patients in the nonoperative group, 44 in the LP group, and 37 in the HA group. The outcome assessors were blinded to the study group. The mean DASH score at 2-year follow-up was 30.4 (standard error (SE) 3.25), 31.4 (SE 3.11), and 26.6 (SE 3.23) points for the nonoperative, LP, and HA groups, respectively. At 2 years, the between-group differences were 1.07 points (95% CI [-9.5,11.7]; p = 0.97) between nonoperative and LP, 3.78 points (95% CI [-7.0,14.6]; p = 0.69) between nonoperative and HA, and 4.84 points (95% CI [-5.7,15.4]; p = 0.53) between LP and HA. No significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were seen in stratified age groups (60 to 70 years and 71 years and over). At 2 years, we found 30 complications (3/52, 5.8% in nonoperative; 22/49, 45% in LP; and 5/49, 10% in HA group, p = 0.0004) and 16 severe pain-related adverse events. There was a revision rate of 22% in the LP group. The limitation of the trial was that the recruitment period was longer than expected due to a high number of exclusions after the assessment of eligibility and a larger exclusion rate than anticipated toward the end of the trial. Therefore, the trial was ended prematurely.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no benefit was observed between operative treatment with LP or HA and nonoperative treatment in displaced 3- and 4-part PHFs in patients aged 60 years and older. Further, we observed a high rate of complications related to operative treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246167.

摘要

背景

肱骨近端骨折(PHF)是常见骨折,尤其多见于老年女性患者。这些骨折通常采用手术治疗,但最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。

方法和发现

本多中心、随机 3 臂优效性、开放性试验的主要目的是评估非手术治疗和锁定钢板(LP)或半髋关节置换术(HA)治疗 3 部分和 4 部分 PHF 的结果,主要结局是 2 年随访时的上肢残疾量表(DASH)评分。2011 年 2 月至 2019 年 12 月,160 名 60 岁及以上 3 部分和 4 部分 PHF 患者按 1:1:1 的比例以 10 人为一组的块大小随机分配接受非手术治疗(对照组)或 LP 或 HA 手术干预。共有 54 名患者被分配到非手术组,52 名到 LP 组,54 名到 HA 组。5 名 LP 组患者由于严重粉碎性骨折而在围手术期重新分配到 HA 组,所有这些患者均为 4 部分骨折。在意向治疗分析中,非手术组有 42 名患者,LP 组有 44 名患者,HA 组有 37 名患者。结局评估者对研究组设盲。2 年随访时,非手术组、LP 组和 HA 组的 DASH 评分分别为 30.4(标准误差 [SE] 3.25)、31.4(SE 3.11)和 26.6(SE 3.23)分。2 年时,非手术组与 LP 组之间的组间差异为 1.07 分(95%CI[-9.5,11.7];p=0.97),非手术组与 HA 组之间的组间差异为 3.78 分(95%CI[-7.0,14.6];p=0.69),LP 组与 HA 组之间的组间差异为 4.84 分(95%CI[-5.7,15.4];p=0.53)。在分层年龄组(60 至 70 岁和 71 岁及以上)中未观察到主要或次要结局的显著差异。2 年时,我们发现有 30 例并发症(非手术组 3/52,5.8%;LP 组 22/49,45%;HA 组 5/49,10%;p=0.0004)和 16 例严重疼痛相关不良事件。LP 组的修订率为 22%。试验的局限性在于,由于在资格评估后排除了大量患者,以及在试验接近尾声时排除率高于预期,因此招募期比预期的要长。因此,该试验提前结束。

结论

在这项研究中,60 岁及以上的移位 3 部分和 4 部分 PHF 患者中,与非手术治疗相比,LP 或 HA 手术治疗并未显示出优势。此外,我们观察到与手术治疗相关的并发症发生率较高。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246167。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10683994/0c31f44f90e3/pmed.1004308.g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 18;16(7):e1002855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002855. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 11(11):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub4.
6
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub3.
8
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is the Most Cost-effective Treatment Strategy for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Adults: A Cost-utility Analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):2013-2026. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002219. Epub 2022 May 4.
9
Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):e259-e269. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
10
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 7;51(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02912-9.
2
Proximal humerus fractures: Treatment controversies.
OTA Int. 2025 May 2;8(3 Suppl):e382. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000382. eCollection 2025 May.
7
[Conservative fracture treatment in old people].
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jul;57(4):321-329. doi: 10.1007/s00391-024-02314-3. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
8
A Comprehensive Review of Proximal Humerus Fractures: From Epidemiology to Treatment Strategies.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57691. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality following proximal humerus fracture-a nationwide register study of 147,692 fracture patients in Sweden.
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Feb;34(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06612-7. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
3
Mortality after a proximal humeral fracture.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1484-1490. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0627.R1.
4
Mortality after inpatient stay for proximal humeral fractures.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jan;29(1):e22-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 18;16(7):e1002855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002855. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Proximal humeral fractures in Sweden-a registry-based study.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):901-907. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3808-z. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures.
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):280-4. doi: 10.1111/ans.13451. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Increased mortality after upper extremity fracture requiring inpatient care.
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):533-57. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1043833.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验