Pfeiffer-Kaushik Emily R, Smith Godfrey L, Cai Beibei, Dempsey Graham T, Hortigon-Vinagre Maria P, Zamora Victor, Feng Shuyun, Ingermanson Randall, Zhu Renjun, Hariharan Venkatesh, Nguyen Cuong, Pierson Jennifer, Gintant Gary A, Tung Leslie
Vala Sciences Inc., 6370 Nancy Ridge Drive, Suite 106, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Clyde Biosciences Ltd, BioCity Scotland, Bo'Ness Road, Newhouse, Lanarkshire, Scotland ML1 5UH, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Science, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2019 Sep-Oct;99:106612. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106612. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Voltage-sensitive optical (VSO) sensors offer a minimally invasive method to study the time course of repolarization of the cardiac action potential (AP). This Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) cross-platform study investigates protocol design and measurement variability of VSO sensors for preclinical cardiac electrophysiology assays.
Three commercial and one academic laboratory completed a limited study of the effects of 8 blinded compounds on the electrophysiology of 2 commercial lines of human induced pluripotent stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes (hSC-CMs). Acquisition technologies included CMOS camera and photometry; fluorescent voltage sensors included di-4-ANEPPS, FluoVolt and genetically encoded QuasAr2. The experimental protocol was standardized with respect to cell lines, plating and maintenance media, blinded compounds, and action potential parameters measured. Serum-free media was used to study the action of drugs, but the exact composition and the protocols for cell preparation and drug additions varied among sites.
Baseline AP waveforms differed across platforms and between cell types. Despite these differences, the relative responses to four selective ion channel blockers (E-4031, nifedipine, mexiletine, and JNJ 303 blocking I, I, I, and I, respectively) were similar across all platforms and cell lines although the absolute changes differed. Similarly, four mixed ion channel blockers (flecainide, moxifloxacin, quinidine, and ranolazine) had comparable effects in all platforms. Differences in repolarisation time course and response to drugs could be attributed to cell type and experimental method differences such as composition of the assay media, stimulated versus spontaneous activity, and single versus cumulative compound addition.
In conclusion, VSOs represent a powerful and appropriate method to assess the electrophysiological effects of drugs on iPSC-CMs for the evaluation of proarrhythmic risk. Protocol considerations and recommendations are provided toward standardizing conditions to reduce variability of baseline AP waveform characteristics and drug responses.
电压敏感光学(VSO)传感器提供了一种微创方法来研究心脏动作电位(AP)复极化的时间进程。这项全面的体外致心律失常分析(CiPA)跨平台研究调查了用于临床前心脏电生理分析的VSO传感器的方案设计和测量变异性。
三个商业实验室和一个学术实验室完成了一项有限的研究,研究8种盲法化合物对2种商业化人诱导多能干细胞衍生心肌细胞(hSC-CMs)电生理的影响。采集技术包括CMOS相机和光度测量;荧光电压传感器包括di-4-ANEPPS、FluoVolt和基因编码的QuasAr2。实验方案在细胞系、铺板和维持培养基、盲法化合物以及测量的动作电位参数方面进行了标准化。使用无血清培养基来研究药物的作用,但各研究地点的具体成分以及细胞制备和药物添加方案各不相同。
基线AP波形在不同平台和细胞类型之间存在差异。尽管存在这些差异,但所有平台和细胞系对四种选择性离子通道阻滞剂(分别为E-4031、硝苯地平、美西律和JNJ 303,分别阻断I、I、I和I)的相对反应相似,尽管绝对变化有所不同。同样,四种混合离子通道阻滞剂(氟卡尼、莫西沙星、奎尼丁和雷诺嗪)在所有平台上具有可比的效果。复极化时间进程和对药物反应的差异可归因于细胞类型和实验方法的差异,如分析培养基的成分、刺激活动与自发活动以及单次添加化合物与累积添加化合物。
总之,VSO是评估药物对iPSC-CMs的电生理作用以评估致心律失常风险的一种强大且合适的方法。针对标准化条件提供了方案考虑因素和建议,以减少基线AP波形特征和药物反应的变异性。